Find me on @mehulkar. Not doing an official redirect so I can still come lurk here when I want to.
| Real Account | https://indieweb.social/@mehulkar |
mehulkar (FE)
- 8 Followers
- 77 Following
- 46 Posts
Lurking. Real account: @mehulkar
@mia đź‘‹ any reason it shouldn't just be on for everyone?
The img:not([alt] CSS on this server is so effective. Seeing images from all over the fediverse without descriptions.
I’m other words… taking the pressure off making One Set of Rules could actually make it easier to have the Generally Accepted Set of Rules that most people want anyway?
I wonder if, on average, “free speech” will be nicer purely because instances are smaller. The #fediverse could have the same number of members, but because they’re organized in small faux communities, it will be harder to be a jerk?
- higher risk of being ostracized/banned on your own instance if you misbehave (easier to be nice to “real” people than the entire internet)
- admins can define and enforce stricter policies with less scrutiny (house rules are easier when the house is small)
Technical Architecture GroupThe TAG is tooting.
TIL that Mastodon is a #rails app
Update reference of rel=me value for <a> links by mehulkar · Pull Request #22265 · mdn/content
Description The page for me says that it is allowed on <a> elements. But this table suggests that it is "not allowed" on <a> (or is it only not allowed on <area> ? It was a bit confusing, so I'm ma...
On that link ^ it says <a> is ok, but on another page mdn says rel=me isn't allowed on <a>
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes/rel
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes/rel
