So, uh, there are a bunch of papers that are of extremely low quality promoted by the press all the time, sure, but there is so much wrong with the so-called “Krefeld study” and beyond the paper itself BUT instead of other researchers criticizing it at least try to attempt to point out some individual flaws (like the insanely long list of sponsors and the clickbait title) they just went “it’s flawed and got a lot of methodological errors” in a single interview and nothing else.

From my poor understanding of anything in life, this “immutable” bs is the exact opposite of how MS-DOS and most software written for it required full hardware access at all times. I don’t like both but the former sounds much worse than the latter and only because the MS-DOS era was defined by what. 16-bit graphics via Windows 3.1 and later landline-based internet provided by America Online at best.

If my surgeon should complain about my weird bite tomorrow, I may remember him of this YouTube-exclusive ad produced by Extra gum celebrating people under the age of 30 with missing front teeth and completely bent gums MUCH worse than mine like it’s something someone should be proud of.