Maeve

@maevewalsh
290 Followers
324 Following
78 Posts

Interested in: Online Harms | Digital Regulation | Digital Inclusion | Responsible Tech | Public Health Policy | Government, Governance & Trust

Once a Civil Servant. Now a policy, advocacy and government relations consultant. Always London-Irish

Today's #Ofcom research on the extent and impact of #onlinefraud and #onlinescams confirms the obvious: every day the #OnlineSafetyBill is further delayed means more people are at risk of losing money, to the detriment not just of their finances but also their wellbeing.

- 46% had been personally drawn in by an online scam
-25 % of those who'd encountered online scams had lost money
- 34% of all victims said it had an immediate negative impact on their mental health

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2023/scale-and-impact-of-online-fraud-revealed?

Scale and impact of online fraud revealed

Around nine in ten online adults in the UK (87%) have come across content they suspected to be a scam or fraud, new research commissioned by Ofcom reveals.

Ofcom

Excellent short @Ofcom
explainer on how they intend to approach risk assessments in the #OnlineSafetyBill - appropriately caveated, given the Bill is still likely to be amended (NB the gaping hole where there was once an assessment required for the adult safety duties, otherwise known as "legal but harmful".)

But this is a commendable piece of regulatory pitch-rolling, with clear steers on principles and practicalities before can get going on their formal consultation. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2023/how-we-are-approaching-online-safety-risk-assessments

How we are approaching online safety risk assessments

As the Online Safety Bill progresses through Parliament, Ofcom explains our proposed approach to risk, and how we plan to support services in carrying out their assessments.

Ofcom

Great to see @LornaWoods quoted in today's Guardian piece on how a #VAWG code of practice - as developed by Prof Woods along with Carnegie UK and many other charities and campaigning organidations - will work if the #OnlineSafetyBill amendment tabled by Baroness Morgan is successful.

There's a notable momentum behind this now on all sides of the House, with the amendment co-signed by Baroness Kidron (cross-bencher), the Bishop of Gloucester and Labour's Lord Knight.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/feb/10/uk-peers-call-for-code-of-practice-on-protecting-women-on-social-media

‘Making the digital streets safe’: Calls for greater protection for women online

British peers propose amendment to online safety bill requiring social media sites to consider how to keep female users safe

The Guardian
The IMF, the pollsters, your own chancellor, and anyone who has a mortgage? That left wing establishment?

Great to see the Daily Telegraph splash today on the growing momentum behind an amendment to the #OnlineSafetyBill to introduce a #code of practice to address #onlineabuse & violence against women and girls: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/03/online-misogyny-set-outlawed/

It's being backed in the House of Lords by Baroness Morgan and Baroness Bertin; numerous other Peers spoke in support of it in Wednesday's Second Reading debate.

Here's the draft #VAWG code, developed by #CarnegieUK @LornaWoods and others: https://d1ssu070pg2v9i.cloudfront.net/pex/pex_carnegie2021/2022/05/24163713/VAWG-Code-of-Practice-16.05.22-Final-1.pdf

Online misogyny set to be outlawed

Government will use new Bill to crack down on abuse of women and girls on the internet

The Telegraph
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/33741/documents/184371/default/
@maevewalsh Especially when the purpose is "We wanted to understand whether people feel an overall benefit from digital technologies and whether people feel we have the right rules in place."

Little wonder that DCMS's public attitudes to digital regulation tracker was published last week with very little fanfare.

Doesn't look very convenient or comfortable for the Government when adults' concerns about #onlinesafety and #onlineharms shoot up - from 38% to 45% in just 6 months - but you've since removed the very duties from the #OnlineSafetyBill that would have provided greater protections for them.

Full tracker here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-digital-regulation-tracker-survey/public-attitudes-to-digital-regulation-tracker-survey

Public attitudes to digital regulation: tracker survey

GOV.UK
#introductions : call me JJ. This is my first foray into the fediverse, and I'm already pleased to see that many of the people I enjoyed following when I was most active on Twitter (2008-2012) are on here too. Looking forward to some good discussions. To try and add value rather than noise to the Fediverse, I think I'm going to spend at least a few weeks trying to convince you that you should care more - and get other people to care more - about the #OnlineSafetyBill in the UK. 🧵

For those of you wanting a little Christmas reading, here is the latest version of the #OnlineSafetyBill after its second trip through committee. Back into report after Christmas:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-03/0220/220220.pdf

Here's a summary of the changes from the beginning of December, referring to the then amendment numbers:
https://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/blog-posts/online-safety-bill-indicative-amendments/