16 Followers
8 Following
80 Posts

The drift of Musk's approach to Twitter is far-right, even at its most haphazard and skill-less.

Being a contrarian and going "well actually, maybe this could be good because <insert leftist theoretical argument here that bears no relationship to material realities on the ground>!" is not spectacularly useful. And quite unwise.

You do not, under any circumstances, have to "hand it" to Musk.

People like to compare Mastodon with email,: a distributed, federated communication network based on open protocols and message exchange.
However, what doesn't often get mentioned is that from the moment the internet became widely available, email was always commercial. At first you got it as part of your ISP's connection package. Then from ad-based email providers. Then from datamining ad-supported centralized services like gmail or hotmail. Self hosting was never a universal solution.

Emoji HTTP status codes (circa 2020 pandemic despair)

200 👍🏞
201 🆕
202 ✅

301 ➡ïļ
302 👉🏞
304 🆒
307 👋🏞

400 👎🏞
401 🔐
402 ðŸ’ģ
403 ⛔
404 ðŸĪ·â€â™€ïļ
410 ðŸŠĶ
418 ðŸŦ–

500 ðŸ˜ą
501 😈
502 🖕🏞
503 ☠ïļ
504 ⌛💀

According to my Slack message to myself I did this during the COVID lockdowns in spring 2020.

@adamhjk Well, this current boost is exposing the limitations of the original architecture, so its exactly the right time to extend it. I completely agree with you that the p2p architecture is extremely wasteful in large scales, not only in storage and network connections. Not as a slight to the designers or implementers (as you said in the OP), but Mastodon simply wasn't designed for such a scale: https://nora.codes/post/scaling-mastodon-in-the-face-of-an-exodus/
Scaling Mastodon in the Face of an Exodus | Nora Codes

@adamhjk I think a relatively scalable model that would still allow for smaller-scale governance is to have "relay" servers that function as centralized transports for many instances. They can deduplicate and cache, especially for popular accounts, and allow the leaf instances to focus on serving their users, not talking to every single server out there.

To borrow an infosec term, those are two different threat models that require different solutions. Sometimes it looks like a solution works for both - "build a new network in the empty spaces of the internet!" - but the motivations can be very different. And the threat model - what we want our network to do for us, what we want it *not* to do, who is it for - are very different.

4/4

In the 90s, the internet was a frontier. Anything could be yours if you built it, and no one to tell you what to do. A libertarian fantasy.
In 2022, the internet is a Gibson-esque sprawling corporate-controlled sprawl where your actions are constantly monitored and controlled by those people who run the system.

3/4

What changed? One thing is that sometimes these ideologies defy the convenient single-axis spectrum and have many similarities in practice. But I think the interesting part is the change in the landscape that you are rebelling against, or perhaps revolutionizing.

2/4

One of the fascinating aspects of the #fediverse is how much it resonates with left wing ideology (or rhetoric, at least). "Seize the means of production" from the tech billionaire class.
https://mastodon.lol/@andthisismrspeacock/109385456117954973

But at the same time, the vibe is also nostalgic to 90s internet idealism, DIY web sites and self governed communities, which really resonates with *right wing* ideology, Jeffersonian self-governance through the libertarian prism of John Perry Barlow and Esther Dyson.

1/4

AndThisIsMrsPeacock ðŸģïļâ€ðŸŒˆ (@[email protected])

Timeline of a new Mastodon user: Day 1: this sucks servers are confusing and why is my feed empty Day 2: why is there no quote tweet this is dumb Day 3: mastodon better make some changes if it wants to compete with tw_tter Day 7: hm, people are really nice here Day 10: loving the no ads and real conversations Day 15: THE WORKERS MUST SEIZE THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION AND EXECUTE CAPITALISTS :ablobcatrave: #TwitterMigration

Mastodon.lol
It's nice to pretend that the fediverse is the internet in 1993 and operates under its own laws, but that wasn't true then, and it certainly isn't true now. There's a utopistic streak of rhetoric thinking that because we're posting on a non-commercial platform, we've opted out of "the system". But that's absolutely not true, and furthermore, it's escapist and defeatist. The promise of decentralized networks isn't as a TAZ to escape the system, but as a means to *change* the system, gradually.