- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 1 Posts
I think you might be defending a guy purposefully obfuscating the issue. Yes, my point is obvious and mocking, that’s generally how sarcasm works.
The American Civil war began with a Confederate attack on Fort Sumter. At the same time it was never established that you can opt out of the US, that’s generally not how countries work.
The Confederacy would not have happened if it wasn’t for fears of abolishing slavery.
Lincoln’s election provoked South Carolina’s legislature to call a state convention to consider secession. South Carolina had done more than any other state to advance the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws and even secede. On December 20, 1860, the convention unanimously voted to secede and adopted a secession declaration. It argued for states’ rights for slave owners but complained about states’ rights in the North in the form of resistance to the federal Fugitive Slave Act, claiming that Northern states were not fulfilling their obligations to assist in the return of fugitive slaves.
It was “states rights for me but not for thee”.
Why were the slave-owning states the only ones “rising concerns” around “federalism”? A curious coincidence indeed
The American Civil War was fought over slavery, not independence in terms of foreign policy.
I don’t care. I watched an interview with him and his foreign policy takes were so horrid he would be laughed out of the room if he said something like this in my country. Guess some people in the UK don’t really give a crap about Ukraine.
I’m not from the UK but when I last watched something with Corbyn he was shilling for Russia, how is that not an absolute deal-breaker?
Well, now that I look at her pf picture that seems to be the case, although it doesn’t answer any of my questions
Source? This is cropped exactly so that you don’t see what the first guy is responding to. Mighty sus
I’ll just use Firefox mobile with uBlock Origin then, literally anything is better than ads