Open AI基于上百万张吉卜力的剧照训练了一个Gen AI吉卜力风格图像生成器，并且辩解自己不算偷，只是基于fair use.
网上迅速出现大量图片，包括吉卜力风格的川普/马斯克。直到今天白宫官方账号发了一条这个生成器做的反移民的图像，一个ICE官员和一个哭泣的移民。我不想转发，指路这里可以看https://www.instagram.com/p/DHugG2xNFVr/
很无语，特别是考虑到吉卜力早期动画中很多反法西斯的主题。
这就是我想说的：Gen AI图像也许本质不是法西斯，但它完美契合了法西斯的目的——极权政权中，机械可复制的文化即不需要创作者的努力，也不需要观众的付出。近一百年前关于“刻奇”的论述中也有提到这点。

看到有个女孩问如何阻止猫翻垃圾桶，怕猫乱吃东西，下面一堆人说要教育，要骂要吼要打。我实在忍不住说，如果不能把垃圾桶和猫分开，可以固定垃圾桶并买童锁卡扣。她很高兴说原来有这样的东西“打开了新世界的大门”。孩子也好猫狗也好，如果真的为了他们好而希望他们符合自己的想法，总可以想办法，而不是打骂恐吓羞辱。他们打猫狗打孩子，只有一个原因，那就是他们打得过。

"Wait, not like that": Free and open access in the age of generative AI
----
- an hour ago | 30 points | 2 comments
- URL: https://www.citationneeded.news/free-and-open-access-in-the-age-of-generative-ai/
- Discussions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43380617
- Summary: The article discusses the impact of generative AI on free and open access to knowledge. It argues that the real threat isn't AI using open knowledge, but rather AI companies exploiting and killing projects that make knowledge free. The author suggests that instead of trying to restrict access, we should focus on establishing fair terms for AI companies to use open-licensed works, including compensation for infrastructure costs and attribution. This approach would ensure the ongoing health of the commons and prevent AI companies from strangling their own food supply.