@josh
RE #Peertube:
Framasoft needs to want PeerTube to grow, but I don’t think that’s really a priority for them right now. IIRC, they’ve said they want to keep staff small and lean hard into slow, incremental growth. They don’t want large angel donations.
The ramifications of that choice include not having the capacity to upgrade quickly, facilitate new features, or even squash bugs with the expediency some might expect. For example, livestreaming & chat control for non-Admins just isn’t a real priority for them, but a real barrier to new streamer-users.
RE #Owncast:
I can’t afford the investment (machinery-wise, server-wise, nor time-wise) to own and operate my own livestream. I’m dumb. I need a simple RTMP “copy-paste-click-go” user interface with someone behind it all who knows how to address potential problems. I donate for that on MakerTube. Owncast itself seems simple, but getting there doesn’t feel that way. And ultimately, it’s not cheap.
The fact that both of these platforms are Open Source colors everything. It feels like they want to be found by users, not sold to them. Marketing seems antithetical, and barriers to use are a protective feature from the “unwashed” and (consequently) sometimes dangerous.
You have to *want* to use most of the Fediverse despite the hurdles, and that takes more drive than most have. Viewers go where the herd goes, sadly, and the Fediverse vacillates between wanting to entice that herd and protecting themselves from it.