Ethan Marcotte, who is one of the most principled and thoughtful people I have ever known and also a dear friend, has resigned from his job at 18F after being asked to meet with shadowy gov-dismantlers. The whole post is worth reading.
https://ethanmarcotte.com/wrote/leaving-18f/
Apparently necessary: Do not be an asshole in my replies about something you’d didn’t even bother to read or understand, this is not Facebook.
As a follow up thought. What's the most important part of research?
I imagine many would say searching for new knowledge emphasizing the search.
However the "re" in research seems far more important. The REcursive nature of REsearching your sources and ensuring their veracity, credibility, or authority on a subject matter. Alternatively REproducing your results to verify your science.
"Do your research" for far too many people means go do a search/use AI full stop.
Later the article says :
"That means ChatGPT will offer multiple perspectives on controversial subjects, all in an effort to be neutral."
Howard Zinn's quote comes to mind:
"You can't be neutral on a moving train."
This approach will absolutely shape humanity and empower oppression.
https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/16/openai-tries-to-uncensor-chatgpt/
"However, the goal of an AI assistant is to assist humanity, not to shape it."
What a joke. They want to act like this is or can be an apolitical tool. Technology is inherently political and this tool will absolutely shape humanity. The paradox of tolerance is something that should be deeply understood in the context of this approach
Bruce Schneier Davi Ottenheimer have written a tremendous piece for Foreign Policy that everyone should read called "DOGE is Hacking America." It clearly explains why what DOGE is doing has to be stopped, and what's at stake here.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/11/doge-cyberattack-united-states-treasury/
I used to subscribe to FP but then found it came with my Apple News subscription. But I realize not everyone has that, so:
https://archive.ph/lSHkJ
Here's an excerpt:
"But the most alarming aspect isn’t just the access being granted. It’s the systematic dismantling of security measures that would detect and prevent misuse—including standard incident response protocols, auditing, and change-tracking mechanisms—by removing the career officials in charge of those security measures and replacing them with inexperienced operators.
The Treasury’s computer systems have such an impact on national security that they were designed with the same principle that guides nuclear launch protocols: No single person should have unlimited power. Just as launching a nuclear missile requires two separate officers turning their keys simultaneously, making changes to critical financial systems traditionally requires multiple authorized personnel working in concert.
This approach, known as “separation of duties,” isn’t just bureaucratic red tape; it’s a fundamental security principle as old as banking itself. When your local bank processes a large transfer, it requires two different employees to verify the transaction. When a company issues a major financial report, separate teams must review and approve it. These aren’t just formalities—they’re essential safeguards against corruption and error.
These measures have been bypassed or ignored. It’s as if someone found a way to rob Fort Knox by simply declaring that the new official policy is to fire all the guards and allow unescorted visits to the vault.
The implications for national security are staggering. Sen. Ron Wyden said his office had learned that the attackers gained privileges that allow them to modify core programs in Treasury Department computers that verify federal payments, access encrypted keys that secure financial transactions, and alter audit logs that record system changes. Over at OPM, reports indicate that individuals associated with DOGE connected an unauthorized server into the network. They are also reportedly training AI software on all of this sensitive data."
"We care about your privacy [...] "By default [...] processes your [...] personal data to""
Nope. You don't care, if you cared, "by default" you would not do anything with my personal data.
Why can't we have anything nice?
This is a lowkey horror story. Forum posts dated 18 years ago turn out to be backdated AI slop, falsely attributed to what used to be human accounts.
@hakan_geijer https://kolektiva.social/@hakan_geijer/113891105255157286
I cannot get over how fucked the internet is becoming because of LLMs and how absolutely critical it is to create meaningful 1-on-1 relationships rather than going for "reach" or "virality." https://hallofdreams.org/posts/physicsforums/
Please note that the Let's Encrypt Growth and Let's Encrypt Certificates Issued Per Day charts are undergoing updates and may not reflect the most recent data. Let's Encrypt Growth Percentage of Web Pages Loaded by Firefox Using HTTPS (14-day moving average, source: Firefox Telemetry) Let's Encrypt Certificates Issued Per Day