A literally toxic book: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-63412913?xtor=AL-72-%5Bpartner%5D-%5Bbbc.news.twitter%5D-%5Bheadline%5D-%5Bnews%5D-%5Bbizdev%5D-%5Bisapi%5D&at_custom3=%40BBCNews&at_custom2=twitter&at_custom1=%5Bpost+type%5D&at_custom4=CD980770-5682-11ED-9DAF-6AEB4744363C&at_medium=custom7&at_campaign=64

Sorry for asking, what's this "note" feature under the profiles of others?

Did Darwin plagiarize Matthew? Part 2: Debunking claims about parroting Matthew (1831). https://historiesofecology.blogspot.com/2016/04/suttons-matthewisms-dismantled.html

Robert Chambers never read Patrick Matthew's book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture" (1831). https://historiesofecology.blogspot.com/2018/01/why-robert-chambers-1832-never-reviewed.html

Patrick Matthew's evolutionary clock (1831). https://historiesofecology.blogspot.com/2019/01/patrick-matthews-evolutionary-clock-1831.html

Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369848618300049

How counterfactuals of Red-Queen theory shed light on science and its historiography. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369848616300978

Exploring mouse trap history (free). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12052-011-0315-8.pdf

Comparing the respective transmutation mechanisms of Patrick Matthew, Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace (free). https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/123/4/864/4869753

The Origin of Specious: misunderstandings about Patrick Matthew’s evolutionary thinking (free).
https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/131/3/706/5912435