3 Followers
7 Following
26 Posts
Every healthy economy needs a robust guillotine maintenance and repair industry.
The technical opinion of anyone who invokes the string ‘cyber’, outside of fiction or jest, should be summarily dismissed.

Every conservative idea is merely a proven and successful progressive idea.

If it requires protection from scrutiny and novel information, it’s stale and should be treated with proportional suspicion.

Progressive ideas are potentially carcinogenic, being manifest from novelty and mutation, but conservative ideas are necrotic.

One facilitates adaptation and resilience within its environment, the other decay and decomposition into its constituent elements.

Either can be toxic at sufficient concentrations.

It is profoundly problematic to perpetuate exposure to an environment which has never been amenable to one’s presence, a flaw which will hopefully be addressed soon.
This isn’t meant to last.
This is for…
right…
now.
Societies are like stews, they need to be stirred periodically to break the layer of scum that settles on top.
Been wondering if RPKI might be a useful origin for an arbitrary, robust, distributed attestation framework. Weigh opinions based on source, history and association. Not my domain of expertise, so may be a flawed premise, but I currently see this as a core function required to protect against systemic centralisation.
Been slowly realising my comprehension of the problem scope is many orders of magnitude shallower than it demands, and that continuing to apply energy is similarly more futile. I’m certain palatable change can be realised, but a realistic and meaningful role toward that goal is functionally intangible.
One of the most effective suicide prevention mechanisms is to create an environment in which one can actively and legitimately choose to participate in when at their most vulnerable.