It wasn’t long though, it’s weird that you didn’t really refute it while it explained how you’re clearly lying, and yet you keep upholding that you’re “not a liar”

This still seems dishonest

OK, anyone else who saw it, please show it to me if it’s real.

Pretty sure it’s just another lie

It is, and could you screenshot that explanation and reply with it here because I don’t remember it

You ignored everything I said. Was my reply too long, or does repeating yourself and ignoring what the other person says just fit for a liar?

It is. Do you have anything else or just completely unexplained denialism?

I don’t think we should “redefine slurs.” Slurs are slurs.

I don’t agree with your definition, and my opinion was prevalent and dictionary-recognized before yours. Would you also like to redefine “redefine” or are you quite simply what’s called lying?

I don’t want to redefine right-wing to mean people who use slurs. I stated that slur-usage is most common among the far-right.

Right - that’s trying to redefine “right-wing” as people who use what you now define as “slurs,” and redefining “far” to mean “near” or “middle,” since you now use “slurs” as a label for normal, common words. Why make me repeat this?

Nope. The person I was replying to mentioned a “very specific desire” of mine. They were trying to pretend politics is no big deal, like people who think climate change is a future problem that will “just get fixed.”

You think we should redefine “slur” to include common words, and then redefine “right wing” to mean “people who use what we now call slurs,” and then redefine “far” to mean “near” or “middle”

These things do not help achieve communism - we need honesty in order to achieve communism, not lies

It sounds like you haven’t even read my post. My whole point (as I’ve repeated many times throughout this thread to others acting like you) is that I cannot solve anything about Lemmy by running my own instance because federation is broken.