I was being passive-agressive.

It seams like you may be well-fit for this type of envoirement.

Reward for being even slightly competent and having work ethic is more work. To the point where you are doing everything until you break.

If you do something that needed to be done out of curtesy it’ll become your responsibility.

If you want to find someone who understand something about the corporation, look at the basement.

How many headlines like that crubled under the shread of scrutiny? Why are we still humoring it. It’s “women learned that she’s pregnant from Google AdWords ad” deliberate propaganda.

Man, you are good at what you do. Yiu should be prouder.

The term that you are looking for is a “greater fool”.

The best case for AI is that can heroicly solve problems that shouldn’t exist in a first place in a well-managed company.

It can structure unstructured data, that should be structured. It can do simple coding where aboslutly no coder could be reached. It can sum up the red tape and produce red tape to meet complience requirement that were where created for the sake of the red tape alone.

If the work is important, it shoudn’t be done by AI. If its busy work, it shouldn’t exist in a first place. No one would need AI to summarize anything if everything was writen clearly.

And thats best case scenario when you don’t count halucynations, errors, edge cases, company specyfic context - things that results in task taking more time after all the “oh it produced something and it looks good at a glance” cloud fall down.

If your company is getting a lot of value from AI than your company is trash.

Control + alt + minus, or just two – next to eachother falowed by a word. It’s transfered into m-dash in most word processors. Also almost any correction tools handle them very well almost seamleslly.

On what do you think AI was trained? It didn’t learn that out of nowhere.

Phew, dogged a bullet here.