hunterpayne

0 Followers
0 Following
8 Posts

This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.
Officialhttps://
Support this servicehttps://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup
Fine, now show a video of what happens if you pierce the Na-ion cell with something metallic. Because explosion doesn't even begin to cover what happens next in that situation. And you are suggesting that everyone should be 2 ft from such a cell, traveling at 60 mph, in all weather conditions. These things should be restricted to grid stabilization batteries and nothing else and you know it. Don't mislead people on such things.

Na is 30x the volatility of Li. Physics doesn't care about your politics. Just like you (at the moment) are acting like you don't care if people die in fires.

If you want to replace FF there is exactly one solution, that's nuclear. Nothing else even scales to the point of making any difference at all. And you need to not just make electricity from the NPPs, but ammonia and some sort of synthetic hydrocarbon too. Anything else is a pipe dream from people who have never looked at the numbers nor learned the physics.

Stop acting like you care about this issue. You have never cared enough to learn about it, so until you do, stop spreading misinformation about how physics works.

PS I have driven an electric car for a decade, they are wonderful. Too bad there isn't enough Li for everyone to have one. Replacing Na with the Li just doesn't work for transport if you at all care about the people riding in the cars.

"Sodium-ion is exciting because..."

Well it is exciting, but not for the reasons you think. More like a Michael Bay movie exciting...there is nothing practical about this design. Most of the cost will be safety systems designed to prevent the battery from being exciting and even then a crash will likely set them off. Pure Na-ion probably isn't viable and certainly isn't viable in a car. Maybe mixing in some Na into the Li-ion to stretch the small amount of Lithium but even then you are significantly increasing the volatility of the battery.

This isn't a practical step, its an act of desperation from people who don't want to admit that large scale electrification is a dumb idea. We electrified everything that made sense to electrify a half century ago.

Its metallic sodium. Its about 30 times more volatile than Lithium. We don't use metallic sodium for almost anything industrial because of this volatility. I assumed there would be some mixed Li-Na-ion batteries. A pure Na-ion battery is an explosive waiting to go off. Putting these in a car...seems rather like a poor choice unless you are a personal injury lawyer.
Can you guess what the #1 source of wealth increase in the AA community has been over the last 20 years? That's right, grandma's house...guess where she lived.
rent control dramatically decreases the incentives to build and in many cases makes it impossible (read uneconomic) to do so
Average home price in Tokyo is 1.5x that of Houston. Average wage in Houston is 1.5x that of Tokyo. So the data doesn't support your post unless you really really love sushi and arcades.

"When the options ar homelessness or subsidized housing, subsidized housing is absolutely the best option, which is backed up by decades of data."

Not quite. That's only true if you are housing people who ended up homeless due to bankruptcy or similar reasons (lost jobs, medical issues, etc). If you have people who are homeless due to sever addiction, you just end up with more OD deaths. You have similar issues with people with sever mental illness.

The homeless are not a monolith and different parts of the population need different solution unless you really really don't give a f*ck about them.