And that sounds fine, but Wireguard is not an overhyped industry promising huge gains in the future to investors and to developers jumping on a bandwagon who can find problems for this solution.

I actually have built agents already in the past and this is my opinion. If you read the article the author says they want to hear the reasoning for disliking it, so this is mine, the only way to create a business is raising money and hoping somebody strikes gold with the shovel Im paying for.

The submission is an advertisement for fly.io and OpenAI , both are paid services. We are commenting on an ad.
The person who wrote it did it for money. Fly.io operates for money, OpenAi charges for their API.

They posted it here expecting to find customers. This is a sales pitch.

At this point why is it an issue to expect a developer to make money on it?

As a dev, If the chain of monetization ends with me then there is no mainstream adoption whatsoever on the horizon.

I love to tinker but I do it for free not using paid services.

As for tinkering with agents, its a solution looking for a problem.

Yeah but fly.io is a cloud provider doing this advertisement with OpenAI Apis. Both cost money, so if it's not free to operate then the developed project should offset the costs.

Its about balance.

Really its the AI providers that have been promising unreal gains during this hype period, so people are more profit oriented.

Agents use Apis that I will need to pay for and generally software dev is a job for me that needs to generate income.

If the Apis I call are not profitable for the provider then they won't be for me either.

This post is a fly.io advertisement