Limiting of social media access, hopefully.

“But we’d never do that to each other.”

Texas is so pro life they’ll end yours

I’m not sure how anything I’ve written contradicts this tbh. I agree.

That appears to be a quickly referenced theory by one (yes qualified) person on one blog post without a study behind it. I could also argue that kids generally have short attention spans but social media just allows them to indulge in it more, and they will of course prioritize attention to that over other things. That is not the same as “it shortens their attention spans.” We need at least one study here or at least something more substantive than a one-liner linking social media and decreasing ones attention span. I’m not sure if you noticed, but blog is actually focusing on how to reach kids and strategies to get them to pay attention. It has one throw away non-cited line about social media shortening attention spans.

I should also point out that I also did a cursory Google search before writing the previous comment, and that was the only post I saw as well. The reason you selected it is because there was no other decent hit when you searched I imagine.

Let me be clear here, the only reason I am sort of arguing about this is because there is a really bad propensity for older people to say something is wrong with younger people. We see it over and over again. I think social media is actually very harmful to kids, but I have yet to see anything that shows it actually diminishes ones attention span. And the reason I really don’t like that claim is because it seems to be just another variation of “kids these days.”

Have you ever done an active shooter drill? Teachers don't hang near the front of the classroom.

Just because some people will break rules doesn’t mean we throw our hands up and say ok then no rules.

Please show me where I said that.

But also back in my day they taught us Word, Excel, programming

Well that's an anecdote which I can easily counter with my own: We all immediately got around any firewalls the school had (which were a joke, you just browsed the right path and basically got around it) and played game and all sorts of nonsense at school.

Smartphones are here. Ban them all you want, kids get around it. Build a faraday cage, and your next active shooter gets extra time to do their work. The list of cons vastly outweighs the pros.

Prohibition culture is generally a bad idea. You can't tell kids "don't have sex." You do proper sex ed. You can't block all signals out of a school, you create consequences for continued undesired usage and teach kids responsibility. As the original comment said: https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/443382/Why-must-we-be-done-this-way#entry-comment-2266000

Oh yeah because clearly I misinterpreted you. It can’t possibly be that maybe something is flawed in what you wrote. The only logical explanation is I do that’s a basic grasp of the English language. Got it.

You could use a little more humility.

I’m sorry - computers and the Internet are “just tools” but smart phones are not? Do I really need to unpack that?