In theory. But most states don’t send people elsewhere for bullshit like that. Usually just for things like violent felonies. They don’t want to be seen as possibly protecting a murderer by keeping them from justice.
halcyoncmdr
- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 6 Posts
You seem to have assumed I was saying a State will send law enforcement to another state to get you. That’s not at all what I was saying, but I can see how you misread my comment that way.
I was referencing your State extraditing you to the other state for petty bullshit like recording your own calls. They’re not going to bother with that, there are way more pressing matters to attend to in their own state than doing what a state like Florida wants.
That even ignores the even more egregious fact that she was supposedly Army. How many Army personnel are usually on Navy ships?
There are exceptions of course, and any number of possible explanations. But just that off the bat should make you pause for a second since it’s weird.
The two-party consent state laws vary on this. So if you care, you would need to handle both ends of the call giving consent to be sure. This is why companies tell you they are recording even if they’re located in a one-party state.
So assuming there’s not an exception… for example, in Michigan there is an exception if you are a participant in a phone call. You just cannot give a third-party permission to record without the other person’s consent. So it’s really a one-party consent state for most things you would care about.
But again… even if we ignore the whole primary purpose here of recording threats… if you live in a one-party state like Arizona, do you really care about Florida if you never go there? And that even assumes Florida cares enough to pursue it in the first place.
Anyone dealing with this administration in ANY capacity need to start recording all of their calls without notice. Recording consent laws are state-level, and most states only require you to know it is being recorded.
Would you rather have proof they threatened you? Or maybe a fine and/or minimal jail, assuming they can even find a jury to convict you for recording threats, AND that there isn’t an exception (several two-party consent States have exceptions that cover things like illegal activity, threats, etc).
One-Party Consent States (38):
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, District of Columbia
Two-Party Consent States (13):
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington
One of the real goals of course, alongside helping Israel kick a hornet’s nest they could never do on their own
He made $400B, not Twitter. That’s almost entirely from Tesla and other ventures, not Twitter.
Last I’ve been able to find Twitter was valued at $33B when xAI bought it.
And that’s just raw valuation which is easily manipulated, not revenue or profit, which can be easily manipulated.
Normies will turn it off and never update again leaving them vulnerable.
That’s the exact reason they stopped letting you disable updates permanently in the first place.
That being said, as it is currently, you already have the option of delaying the restart for multiple days. It only restarts automatically if you repeatedly delay the update for several days and ignore the multiple reminders along the way. And somehow people still complain saying their systems restart “without warning”.
That’s a similar method to the Tesla Model 3 and Y.
The S and X had motorized handles that retracted.
The Cybertruck has no physical handles on the outside. It has a button on the B pillar that activates an electric release to pop the door open.
All of those methods are flush, but only one isn’t visible to rescuers and can completely fail with a lack of power or motor failure with no physical external backup option.
Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?
Yeah, but that literally just happened last month and doesn’t take effect until January 2027. It’s not like they did that years ago because they saw it coming.