Look what came in the mail!
"How technology creates new possibilities for transgender people, and how trans experiences, in turn, create new possibilities for technology"
| website | https://oliverhaimson.com/ |
Look what came in the mail!
"How technology creates new possibilities for transgender people, and how trans experiences, in turn, create new possibilities for technology"
and really the fediverse as a whole, not just Mastodon -- https://wedistribute.org/2023/06/a-partial-queer-trans-and-non-binary-history-of-mastodon-and-the-fediverse/
But also, even though trans people have played such a huge role in the fediverse, notice where the press attention, funding, book deals, etc primarily goes ... that's right, to cis people.
Happy Pride! Today, we're digging into the roots of the fediverse - the many queer, trans, and non-binary people who helped build the Fediverse.
Excited to share this new article led by @averose and co-authored by Kristi Gamarel: "Technology for transgender healthcare: Access, precarity & community care," now published in Social Science & Medicine!
We discuss the care that goes into trans health technologies, as well as their precarious nature.
The article is free open-access, and part of the special issue on "Unequal Care: Trans Medicine and Health in Dangerous Times."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624001576
Online spaces are increasingly important for transgender people who are considering gender-affirming surgeries to find information, ask questions, and communicate with each other. While many surgical resources are community-generated, the onus of providing medical information about surgery should be on the surgical team. We sought to understand the potential for an online space for surgeon and community engagement. We assessed gender-affirming surgeon perspectives on online communication and communities by conducting a survey (*N* = 55) to understand current social media use and gauge surgeons' opinions related to participating in online spaces. We found that gender-affirming surgeons were not generally in support of a new online platform for patient-surgeon communication, with 67% responding that a new platform was not needed. Participants identified potential negative implications including risks to patients (e.g., misinformation, liability, and platform use in emergency situations) and risks to surgeons (e.g., the additional burden that the platform would place on their already-limited time, changes to surgeon culture, and safety concerns related to online harassment). Potential positive implications include opportunities to improve patient education and enhance patient care. Our results establish empirical understanding of social media use patterns among gender-affirming surgeons and may inform the design of resources to enable trans patients to receive the information and care that they require when considering and undergoing gender-affirming surgery.