It’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for life
It’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for life
US universities must tackle their huge carbon footprints
How we are evaluated by others has critical consequences for our careers. Decisions about publications, grants, promotions, & tenure depend on input from peers.
But there are numerous documented biases in peer review. We review these biases & call for a better way forward.
Peer review is a core component of scientific practice. Although peer review ideally improves research and promotes rigor, it also has consequences for what types of research are published and cited and who wants to (and is able to) advance in research-focused careers. Despite these consequences, fe …
"To make the most of our discipline, we need not only strong experimentation, but also powerful approaches to capture and scrutinize our quintessential element, the psychological situation in the field."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S006526012300014X
Here is something that ChatGPT is quite adept at -- devising entries for the Lyttle Lytton contest. But still, it just can't match humans. (content warning: horrendous similes)
The Long War on Black Studies
https://www.nybooks.com/online/2023/06/17/the-long-war-on-black-studies/
No justice without sustainability: Taking the climate and environment literally in diversity, equity, and inclusion work.