Adrian Chan

@gravity7
37 Followers
221 Following
16 Posts

Social Interaction Design (SxD) at https://gravity7.com/, ex CX/UX/Digital Transformation Deloitte Digital, Stanford IR, Born Edinburgh Lived Berlin. SF. Guitar, Cycling, Photography, Film, Philosophy.

Interested in the intersection of AI and social interaction design - where AI and social behaviors meet on social platforms and around common web social features.

https://medium.com/@gravity7

Attention may be all I need. Intention is what I want. #chatgpt

Some ChatGPT thoughts on whether bi-directional prompting could be a thing, namely, for UX

https://medium.com/@gravity7/bi-directional-prompting-a82c02bf92c6

Bi-directional prompting - Adrian Chan - Medium

LLM based AIs like ChatGPT use language, but language operates in two modes: the language instantiated as text in the form of writing; and language expressed by speech in the mode of talk. ChatGPT…

Medium
“Chatbots can spew an on-demand stream of citation-heavy pseudoscience on why vaccination doesn’t work, or why global warming is a hoax. That misleading material, posted online, can then be swallowed by future generative AI to produce a new iteration of falsehoods that further pollutes public discourse.”
https://www.ft.com/content/e34c24f6-1159-4b88-8d92-a4bda685a73c
Generative AI is sowing the seeds of doubt in serious science

News, analysis and comment from the Financial Times, the worldʼs leading global business publication

Financial Times

Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web

https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03697


"Users organize themselves into communities on web platforms. These communities can interact with one another, often leading to conflicts and toxic interactions. ... We show that such conflicts tend to be initiated by a handful of communities---less than 1% of communities start 74% of conflicts."

#OnlineCommunities

Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web

Users organize themselves into communities on web platforms. These communities can interact with one another, often leading to conflicts and toxic interactions. However, little is known about the mechanisms of interactions between communities and how they impact users. Here we study intercommunity interactions across 36,000 communities on Reddit, examining cases where users of one community are mobilized by negative sentiment to comment in another community. We show that such conflicts tend to be initiated by a handful of communities---less than 1% of communities start 74% of conflicts. While conflicts tend to be initiated by highly active community members, they are carried out by significantly less active members. We find that conflicts are marked by formation of echo chambers, where users primarily talk to other users from their own community. In the long-term, conflicts have adverse effects and reduce the overall activity of users in the targeted communities. Our analysis of user interactions also suggests strategies for mitigating the negative impact of conflicts---such as increasing direct engagement between attackers and defenders. Further, we accurately predict whether a conflict will occur by creating a novel LSTM model that combines graph embeddings, user, community, and text features. This model can be used toreate early-warning systems for community moderators to prevent conflicts. Altogether, this work presents a data-driven view of community interactions and conflict, and paves the way towards healthier online communities.

arXiv.org
So, turns out you can't design social media platforms on first principles