>Sealing Paper Packaging Without Adhesives

>"“By irradiating the paper with a CO laser, we create refusible, sugar-like reaction products that we use instead of the synthetic materials or adhesives that would otherwise be required to seal the paper by the heat sealing process. In this way, we are essentially producing our own adhesive in the form of the cleavage products,”

So y'all are sealing paper packagin without adhesives by using adhesives. Brilliant.

Would it really have been so bad to have included the word "Adding" in the title? Because now that you plainly admit that you are using an adhesive I feel as if you've deliberately lied to farm attention. And if you'll lie for attention...well, then, what else will you lie for?

It's a really neat idea. Using lasers to melt the lignans and such...but why not just lean in to that? "Sealing Paper Packaging with Lasers!" Or "Sealing Envelopes with Lasers" or idk...

It's just...you are using an adhesive while claiming not to. It is an adhesive that you manufacture in-situ and without adding any other chemicals, but it is in fact an adhesive. Like, if I said I could start a fire without a fire starter, but then used a bow drill, you'd roll your eyes, right? Because a bow drill is obviously a fire starter.

Right? Why include that? The law automatically applies. Including it in the license is just redundant.

Had it simply read "You may use this site for any purpose." or "You may use this site." or "You may use this" or "This can be used." it would have the same level actual restriciton in that you obviously aren't allowed to use it to break the law regardless of what it actually says.

And, having typed all that, I realize that there is another restriction in that it presumes that there is a 'you' using it. Things that are not 'you' cannot use it given that it specifically lists 'you' in the referenced parties. "This can be used" would be more permissive.