Glyph

@glyph
7.1K Followers
336 Following
34.1K Posts

he/him

You probably heard about me because I am the founder of the Twisted python networking engine open source project. But I’m also the author and maintainer of several other smaller projects, a writer and public speaker about software and the things software affects (i.e.: everything), and a productivity nerd due to my ADHD. I also post a lot about politics; I’d personally prefer to be apolitical but unfortunately the global rising tide of revanchist fascism is kind of dangerous to ignore.

postshttps://blog.glyph.im/
disclosureshttps://blog.glyph.im/pages/disclosures.html
codehttps://github.com/glyph
patronshttps://www.patreon.com/creatorglyph
It's difficult for me to talk calmly about companies that are excited to spend hundreds of millions of dollars training stochastic models while the teachers in every public classroom in North America pay for their own chalk, some of their students' school supplies and some fraction of their students' lunches out of their own pockets. That those companies go on to say this will make the teachers "obsolete" is too much.

I think I’m noticing a trend with English words:

  • “cool” used to mean “a bit cold” but now it mostly means “good”
  • “awesome” used to mean “inspiring awe” but now it mostly means “good”
  • “fantastic” used to mean “fantastical” but now it mostly means “good”
  • “incredible” used to mean “unbelievable” but now it mostly means “good”
  • “amazing” used to mean “inspiring amazement” but now it mostly means “good”
@addison @robert throwing snippets of this at a bunch of AI detectors seems to show a pretty high likelihood of human authorship. Not that that’s totally dispositive either, but more evidence for at least the benefit of the doubt
@addison @robert I have been tricked by AI writing before and this case doesn’t look nearly as clear-cut. it could of course still be (and the author doesn’t give me the highest confidence) but re-reading it is missing a lot of the really obvious tells. I am still willing to give it the benefit of the doubt; this could easily just be a few stylistic tics that someone exposed to a lot of LLM-extruded text might adopt

RE: https://thepit.social/@peter/116376219055579156

I know a lot of people, in software and otherwise, who are feeling things along these lines.

Hold on, whatever tools you’re using, just hold on to your sense of purpose and meaning. There are a lot of forces at work in this world that want to rob you of that. Your feeling of losing that is not recognition of some new fact of our reality; it is you experiencing a psychological weapon.

@jalefkowit ugh there are too many characters in this show. I thought he was a sex criminal but he was apparently just a big supporter of famous sex criminal Dennis Hastert?

DuckDuckGo has a handy feature called "bangs," where you can turn anything you type into your browser's address bar into a search of a specific site just by tacking on a special code associated with that site starting with an exclamation mark. This saves you a lot of clicking around.

You just have to be careful to use the right bang code. !mw, for instance, will pipe your search through the Merriam-Webster dictionary, which is useful all the time. But if your finger slips and you type !me, your search will be piped through the Mass Effect fan wiki

so it cost anthropic $20k to find this openbsd crash bug which amounts to putting a negative integer in a tcp field where a negative integer was not expected by the c code which does some cavalier int cast bullshit, ie. a vuln which is totally fuzzable, and quite certainly would have been found by the fuzzers of the 2010s had anyone cared to burn that much compute on fuzzing openbsd.

The difference today is not that anybody suddenly cares about investing that much in openbsd (is the build server still a donated machine running in Theo's basement?), but that openbsd's reputation for security makes it really good marketing if you can find a bug, any bug, it doesn't matter; and that marketing value is what makes it worth spending $20k on fuzzing.

to be clear many dear friends have said this in an attempt to be fair. I do not wish retroactive violence upon anyone for having made this error. I just want this to set a baseline for future discussions so everyone knows they can’t do it any more
@whitequark yeah it’s kinda funny but not really a joke