Fred M Stoll

333 Followers
207 Following
119 Posts
Neuroscience Research Assistant Prof at Mount Sinai (NY).
Value-based decisions, learning, single neuron and LFPs, all things PFC/subcortical
Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=jlbpOEsAAAAJ

Very excited to share the work that kept me busy for the greater part of the last 8 years (!), now published in Neuron.

Analyzing almost 8,000 neurons from orbitofrontal, ventrolateral frontal cortex and amygdala in monkeys, we found specific markers of dissociable valuation systems, which is questioning the current OFC-centric view of how subjective valuation might be computed.

Have a read and share widely!

Free author version for 2months:

https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1iy3D3BtfH99w-

@cogneurophys @cogsci

Following Elsevier's decision to raise the article processing charge for NeuroImage to $3,450, all editors (inc. chief editors) from NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports have resigned, effective immediately.

I am joining this action and have also resigned.

Full announcement: https://imaging-neuroscience.org/Announcement.pdf

More like this!!! Entire 40-person ed. board of Elsevier-published journal resigns in protest to absurd $3000+ APCs to start a competing title on a non-profit model: https://imaging-neuroscience.org.
Imaging Neuroscience

RT @ImagingNeurosci
All NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal

https://imaging-neuroscience.org

This comes with great regret, and a huge amount of thought and discussion- please read announcement to get more details.

Imaging Neuroscience

For male academics (who are 4x more likely to have a partner at home doing domestic care), the start of the COVID pandemic was a publishing boon. Of the 45 most prolific medical journal authors (60+ papers) during the 1st 18 months, just 5 were women.
https://www.bmj.com/content/381/bmj.p788
How pandemic publishing struck a blow to the visibility of women’s expertise

The biases in scientific publishing during the pandemic damaged women’s visibility, recognition, and career advancement, reports Jocalyn Clark Before covid-19, Reshma Jagsi had a thriving clinical and research career. As a full time physician and deputy department chair of radiation oncology at the University of Michigan, USA, she was ascending the leadership ladder before the world around her went into lockdown. “Everything was an emergency, and [all my colleagues were] working around the clock out of a sense of need, because the house was on fire,” she says. It felt as though “I was drowning.” On top of the acute emergency of helping sick patients, Jagsi was developing rapid treatment guidelines for covid-19 and reorganising research efforts for colleagues—while caring for her elderly mother and tutoring two schoolchildren. Other colleagues with younger children experienced high levels of anxiety, their careers completely sidelined by the pandemic. She says, “During an emergency, it didn’t matter how urgent the need was and how great your expertise was: if you’ve got a toddler who needs your attention and you can’t rely on your parents or your neighbours or day care, what else are you going to do?” When laboratories, operating rooms, and clinical trial sites worldwide closed because of national lockdowns, millions of people working in science found an opportunity to write, driven by a desire to help as well as the need to recover losses or to stay relevant and maintain publication records—the chief currency in research careers.1 Clinicians and academics were eager to secure authorships.2 But the covid-19 publishing game had by no means an equal playing field. Of the three million submissions to major health and medical journals in the first half of 2020, just 36% were from women. This gender gap applied to research and non-research articles, across …

The BMJ

If you ever wanted an extraordinarily in-depth look at how a #bicycle works (physics-wise) have I got the article for you.

https://ciechanow.ski/bicycle/

#cycling

Bicycle – Bartosz Ciechanowski

Interactive article explaining the physics of a bicycle.

Uncovering the organization of neural circuits with Generalized Phase Locking Analysis
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010983
Uncovering the organization of neural circuits with Generalized Phase Locking Analysis

Author summary Modern neural recording techniques give access to increasingly highly multivariate spike data, together with spatio-temporal activities of local field potentials reflecting integrative processes. We introduce GPLA as a generalized coupling measure between these point-process and continuous-time activities to help neuroscientists uncover the distributed organization of neural networks. We develop statistical analysis and modeling methodologies for this measure and demonstrate its interpretability in simulated and experimental multi-electrode recordings.

Well damn.

@KiwiskiNZ just pointed out a pitfall that LLMs pose for scholarly publishing that I hadn't thought about before.

Predatory journals will be able to easily fake peer review.

My guess is that authors legitimately won't be able to tell whether their work was reviewed by a not-very-thoughtful person, or by a bot. And there are plenty of both out there!

Because peer review is anonymous, the predatory publishers have perfect cover for using these systems.

In press! Theta oscillations in anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex differentially modulate accuracy and speed in flexible reward learning #oscillations #learning https://academic.oup.com/oons/advance-article/doi/10.1093/oons/kvad005/7087289
Theta oscillations in anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex differentially modulate accuracy and speed in flexible reward learning

Abstract. Flexible reward learning relies on frontal cortex, with substantial evidence indicating that anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex

OUP Academic
Subgroup analysis is ongoing.
https://xkcd.com/2755/
Effect Size

xkcd