Fiadh (aglæcmæġden)

@fiadh@treehouse.systems
116 Followers
337 Following
372 Posts

A plural system of mostly lesbian-like, vaguely person-shaped things with internal patch notes that are way too extensive for our liking. Note on our listed genders: those are sort of inferred or theoretical but never directly observed, like bare quark masses, in reality they're always experienced with crossover from headmates and other context.

Disabled, in constant pain with CRPS, other stuff isn't very fun either. Mad, unapologetically so. CPTSD as fuck, apologetically so. Jewish as in Tikkun Olam, not as in any genocidal ethnonationalist war machine.

Once upon a time TA'd physics and astronomy, liable to special interest about that stuff periodically, also metrology, radar and assorted other topics.

[Anti-conservative](https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288)

personal web pagehttps://fiadh.neocities.org/
system memberslisted on web page
pronouns (en)she/fae/it
its even better when they try to flatter me like "oh well you can do that, but those other people are the problem" and every single time the "other people" theyre referring to includes me and i get to spend an hour convincing them that no really, i am those other people, and theyre just wrong lol
and they try and argue like "oh but what about THIS edge case that you clearly havent thought of" and i just say "autonomy should never be infringed" over and over until they understand that im not kidding and get really mad at me
🦌
🦌 What unfinished video game thing should we try to finish before all trans people are declared domestic terrorists and we can't play anymore?
actually finish Stellaris endgame for once
25%
BG3 honor mode to completion
0%
Divinity: Original Sin 2
0%
more than two generations in the Sims
25%
Reality Break
0%
Cyberpunk 2077
37.5%
start a new game you haven't played to add to this list in a month
12.5%
Poll ended at .

🦌 Purple numbers popping up over our head as we read over and over

here's my important anti-fascist take

substack link

🦌 A lot of people who damn well know they're guilty avoided voting on this or lied about their position, because we have seen most trans people, and "allies" supported by trans people in these takes, consistently take positions incompatible with the first option, positions that can only justify letting trans people change our identity documents (e.g., birth certificate) on the basis of options 2 or 3, or else they take position 4 and pretend documents like that all say gender when they all say sex.

https://social.treehouse.systems/users/fiadh/statuses/114156997863575331
Fiadh (she/fae/it) (@fiadh@treehouse.systems)

🦅 The Texas "gender identity fraud" bill says that I'm using "gender identity" as an excuse to factually misrepresent my sex (not gender), e.g., by having an ID that says I'm female, or by claiming to be a woman without disclaiming that I'm actually just a biological male who *identifies as* a woman. What is your actual position on that bill? [ ] you're not lying, your sex is female, the same sex as a cis woman [ ] trans people should be allowed to lie about what we are because the truth makes us sad [ ] lying about who and what you are to the gov't and employers isn't the gov't's business [ ] I don't see the problem because trans is about gender, not sex, no reason for you to lie like that

Treehouse Mastodon

🪽 Gonna say upfront: My point here is that you need to look at reality as it is, not as you'd like it to be, to be effective. If you're counting on support that's not there, things will go very badly. But if you have a reality-based appraisal of the situation, you can at least have a fighting chance.

These numbers have only shifted 5–10 points over the past 3 years, it's been bleak for quite some time and we've been trying to raise the alarm but no one wanted us to spoil their happy fantasy that everyone already supports us and only extremist losers no one likes and a few rich elites support anti-trans policy. Bracketed numbers added by us from the linked data.

A new Pew Research Center survey finds that majorities of U.S. adults favor or strongly favor laws and policies that:

Require trans athletes to compete on teams that match their sex assigned at birth (66%) [49% strongly favor, 7% oppose, 8% strongly oppose]
Ban health care professionals from providing care related to gender transitions for minors (56%) [42% strongly favor, 12% oppose, 14% strongly oppose]

The survey also finds that more Americans support than oppose laws and policies that:

Require trans people to use public bathrooms that match their sex at birth, rather than the gender they identify with (49% favor or strongly favor, 26% oppose or strongly oppose) [36% strongly favor, 14% strongly oppose]
Make it illegal for public school districts to teach about gender identity in elementary schools (47% favor or strongly favor, 34% oppose or strongly oppose) [35% strongly favor, 20% strongly oppose]

In turn, adults are much more likely to oppose than favor policies requiring health insurance companies to cover medical care for gender transitions (53% vs. 22%). [36% strongly oppose, 10% strongly favor]

Notice the consistent pattern that people strongly against us outnumber people on our side to any degree. It wasn't quite that bad 3 years ago, but public opinion was already heavily tilted against us on these tangible questions. Support has only looked high if you ask "are you a tolerant person? y/n" rather than anything tangible, or pretended "I want trans people to go away as an issue and never have to hear about them again" is a pro-trans position.

Also: Teenagers are more transphobic than adults now, and both are overwhelmingly transphobic:

  • Adults: 33% say you can be a different gender from your assigned sex vs. 65% say you are your assigned sex/gender always and forever
  • Teens: 30% say you can be a different gender from your assigned sex vs. 69% say we're all fake (49% vs. 50% among teens who support the Democratic Party)

Also note that 48% of teens and 45% of adults say they're comfortable using gender-neutral pronouns for people, so great work by everyone on team "you should call people what they want," you got exactly what you wanted: a third of supposed allies who will just call you what you want to be nice are steadfast that all trans people are fake.

We're going into this with very little real support, because most trans people preferred to just imagine they're already popular and almost no one opposes us, propping up that fiction by certifying every transphobe totally not transphobic if they're just willing to be a two-faced glad-hand who will tell you whatever you want to hear when prompted. Also by pretending apathy is support, but apathy works both ways.

Finally, we can't think of any other demographic so self-destructive that they look at a poll that asks whether they're important for politicians to care about or a distraction from more important things and decides the former is against them and the latter supports them. 21% vs. 77% in this poll Erin Reed told y'all shows 77% on our side against anti-trans laws. Please do read that poll and compare responses on tangible policy and treatment of their kids to the 67% who say they support trans people living as we wish, it is bleak and you should calibrate your perception of professed allies accordingly. Anything past 33% is the minimum number of professed allies taking that anti-trans position. You will see a pattern emerge that about a third of professed allies are outright enemies. A similar fraction are somewhat hostile, but willing to let us have some concessions, or just plain don't care and simply want the whole issue of trans people existing to go away.

Plan accordingly.

Americans have grown more supportive of restrictions for trans people in recent years

Two-thirds of U.S. adults favor laws and policies that require trans athletes to compete on teams that match their sex assigned at birth.

Pew Research Center

🦅 The Texas "gender identity fraud" bill says that I'm using "gender identity" as an excuse to factually misrepresent my sex (not gender), e.g., by having an ID that says I'm female, or by claiming to be a woman without disclaiming that I'm actually just a biological male who identifies as a woman.

What is your actual position on that bill?

you're not lying, your sex is female, the same sex as a cis woman
100%
trans people should be allowed to lie about what we are because the truth makes us sad
0%
lying about who and what you are to the gov't and employers isn't the gov't's business
0%
I don't see the problem because trans is about gender, not sex, no reason for you to lie like that
0%
Poll ended at .

🦌 Getting upset with people willfully misunderstanding the very short and straightforward anti-trans bill making it a felony to knowingly tell (or give the misleading impression to) the Texas government or an employer, in a written or verbal statement, that someone is "the opposite" biological sex from the one they were assigned at birth. ("sex: X" exempt, I guess?)

Some people are pretending this is about gender presentation or adhering to gender roles, when it has absolutely nothing to do with that by any stretch of the imagination.

It is entirely about making false (or misleading) statements about someone's biological sex, and explicitly defining sex assigned at birth as the standard of truth for that. Which means it applies to basically all identification documents of legal relevance to the government or employers. "Misleading" is presumably intended to cover, e.g., saying I'm a woman without disclaiming that I'm a biological male who merely identifies as a woman.

It's called "gender identity fraud" because the logic is that trans people are using "gender identity" as an excuse to lie about our sex. It's not fraud about your gender identity, it's that your gender identity is fraud.

Notice how it's built in the negative space of mainstream, cis-friendly, thought-terminating trans talking points? Everyone who played the "sex and gender are different" game built the mold that they poured their metal into to cast this.

Anyway, the basic opposing positions that are possible are:

  • I'm not lying by claiming my sex (not gender) is female (such as by showing my ID), that's factually true, and it's perverse to punish people for truthful statements*
  • It's false to say my sex is female, but trans people should be allowed to lie about what we are because being honest about it makes us sad and that's not nice
  • It's false to say my sex is female, and that's not cool, but making it a felony is excessive (and maybe shouldn't even be a misdemeanor because it's not the government's business to punish every lie)
  • People should be clear with themselves about which of those positions they hold, and own that and all the implications that follow from it.

    You're welcome for spending 3 hours editing this down from our original outrage.

    Bill here if you want to follow it: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=HB3817

    * Let me tell you a secret: No cis person has any evidence whatsoever to back up their claim that they're the gender or sex they say they are. They only have their assertion of identity. The only reason anyone believes otherwise is that they agree with TERFs about the whole big gamete babby-maker vs. small gamete bepis-haver thing. Self-definition is the only legitimate basis of truth for this, and anything else makes trans people fake. All taxonomies are socially constructed, so this is not a dispute over empirical facts, it's a dispute over ideology: the ideology of self-definition vs. the ideology of the cis binary, which assert entirely different bases of truth on this question.

    Texas Legislature Online - 89(R) Text for HB 3817

    🌟 Oh hey, we always forget about Bandcamp Friday until it's too late. Still 4 hours left.

    We're bad at writing promos, but we've been thoroughly enjoying @YKantRachelRead's most recent album (The Ghost Fetish), it's good for when we want to float in an auditory sea.

    https://rachelunderspoon.bandcamp.com/

    rachel underspoon

    Deep in the heart of San Diego, a non-binary trans girl frantically pecks at a keyboard. These are the sounds that she generates. she/they : synths, guitar, vocals and samples : no gods, no masters, no genres

    rachel underspoon