Approved by cat
Ellias
- 14 Followers
- 21 Following
- 218 Posts
Software Developer, Cyber Security Enthusiast
Lorenzo Franceschi-BicchieraiNEW: I spoke to cybersecurity legend Mikko Hyppönen about his decades-long fight against computers viruses first, and then malware — and how computers have gotten safer over time.
Mikko also told me why he has decided to now turn his focus to fight another enemy: killer drones. And, as it turns out, some of the technical challenges are very similar.
After fighting malware for decades, this cybersecurity veteran is now hacking drones | TechCrunch
Mikko Hyppönen is one of the most recognizable faces of the cybersecurity industry. After fighting computer viruses, worms, and malware, for more than 35 years, he tells TechCrunch why he is now working on systems to stop killer drones.
GrapheneOSBrazil's authoritarian age verification law became active this month. It won't be implemented by GrapheneOS. Complying would require integrating a mandatory process for each user where a third party service checks government identification and confirms a match using the camera.
@metr0pl3x
Welcome to the club.
Welcome to the club.
Unified Attestation is an anti-competitive cartel turning a decentralized decision into a centralized one. Instead of neutral organizations being formed to certify devices without a massive conflict of interest, these companies will sign off on their products regardless of the level of insecurity. Multiple competing companies forming a cartel which locks out other options is not legal. We're fully willing to file one or more lawsuits over this. It should be discontinued now prior to harming us.
Not so long after BharOS "invention"
Iryna VoichukThis must be read.
Ukrainians on Threads are sharing moments from the war that broke them — moments they will carry for the rest of their lives.
This is the reality of war. This pain must be heard.
Below are translations.
I post it this way because I have a character limit here.
@0x00string it is either my bad English or your reading comprehension lol )
The shit you wrote has nothing to do with what I was trying to say lol.
But, sure, mute in return lol
The shit you wrote has nothing to do with what I was trying to say lol.
But, sure, mute in return lol
@0x00string his server was a shared one, according to the article )
I agree with your comment, and it does not contradict my ironic statement.
From what I keep reading daily on Reddit and elsewhere, I can confidently assume that most of those preaching about FOSS implicit "security" would very unlikely go an extra mile and check on the server.
Moreover, I'd dare to suggest that even if that server was running open sounce software, this alone would not necessary make a difference security-wise.
Thus, the point still stands.
I agree with your comment, and it does not contradict my ironic statement.
From what I keep reading daily on Reddit and elsewhere, I can confidently assume that most of those preaching about FOSS implicit "security" would very unlikely go an extra mile and check on the server.
Moreover, I'd dare to suggest that even if that server was running open sounce software, this alone would not necessary make a difference security-wise.
Thus, the point still stands.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@zackwhittaker/116002426721446309
"Open source === secure", and 1001 more fairy tales