Don’t talk to the police.
100% of the people I interact with online pretend to because they think it’s a valid rebuttal.
NO ONE I know IRL actually gets their meat from those mythical “small, family-owned, ethical farms”.
Badly needed in news. I’m trying to replace my news and current events with RSS and it’s though since it’s easy to get inundated with info and never “catch up”.
I downvote articles in News but still see things that pertain to what I downvote. I don’t even know what that feature does.
This isn't even necessarily tech. A bunch of models do assume we're going to figure out how to physically pull GHGs out of the air (a new favorite argument from those with ties to oil - "don't worry bro, we'll capture it later") with new tech but a bunch of these offsets are just trees.
Here's the bullshit:
Most projects look at historical deforestation within a region to forecast a baseline deforestation rate, or the amount of deforestation that would have happened without the project’s intervention, West said. The problem is, it’s all based on hypotheticals.