I’m not all-knowing, nor do I operate in the religious world-building axis.

There’s no free will if God is all-knowing - because that means he already knows the future, so the future has already happened - everything is predestined.

I’m literally not a self-proclaimed “traditional wife” though. That was my whole initial point. Just cause I’m interested in domestic life for example doesn’t mean I have to be interested in ALL aspects of that sphere. You’re free to pick and choose interests from various areas in life. I have a feeling we’re arguing different points. And I’m both pro modesty and pro buttcheek showing miniskirts, yes, it’s called being pro choice.

I… never posted anything like that? That’s a wild claim to make considering my post/comment history is easily accessible. There’s nothing oppressive about “modesty and decorum”, but the way it’s forced onto women in stereotypical “traditionalist” circles absolutely is. There’s no choice. It couldn’t give any “traditional wife” vibes in the first place since that’s not an eclectic label.

Thanks!!! I have a browser thing that automatically removes paywalls on PC. I shared this link from my phone and I don’t know how to get that same thing going on mobile too, lol.

But I am, hahaha. This comment on one of my posts is actually what inspired this meme in the first place. I’m interested in many different things - doesn’t mean I have to be a blueprint stereotype. (I’m not interested in stereotypical conservative oppressive traditionalism though. And especially not grifting).

Exactly - they’re trying to sell an idealised/romanticised fantasy that not even they themselves are living. There’s this article about a right wing influencer who tried actually being a tradwife (spoiler: it failed miserably): nytimes.com/…/lauren-southern-tradwife-maga.html.

I think so. Why?