The Sensationalizing True Crime Podcast brought up really interesting information about copy-cat crimes. I was surprised that they are covered more in the media than actual research. This reveals how the digital world really promotes fear and makes viewers believe ideas even when there is little information to back them. This made me think about cultivation theory and how people may believe copy-cat crimes are widespread just because they see them often in the media. #so339

In the Sensationalizing True Crime Podcast, I found the discussion of "Murderabilia" really interesting. I had never heard this term before, and it made me recognize how inappropriate it is to capitalize off murderers and violence. I completely see how selling this merchandise downplays the severity of criminal actions. I'm wondering how often I've been exposed to "Murderabilia" and if I've ever questioned it or thought it was wrong. #so339

I was surprised to read about how the NYPD News framed videos of police action in specific ways with zooming, captions, and other strategies. It is unsettling to think about how people will encourage a certain image and shape the perspectives of others, even those in high positions of authority. #so339

I was interested in the statistic where the NYPD had high public engagement but a responding rate at near zero on Twitter (p. 399). It's intriguing how they use media just to promote information and influence the public rather than for genuine engagement and discussion. I understand that it is important to inform others, but could it be helpful for police to engage more with the public, and would this build more trust? #so339

Cheng (2020) makes an interesting point about how police use social media for legitimation. They rely on it to promote narratives that support their actions and make them seem less violent. This reminds me of how the Corner Boys also use social media for legitimization. When they post weapons and talk about crime, they try to legitimize their actions and identity as violent. It's interesting how such different groups can use media in similar ways to achieve goals. #so339

The whole idea of investigating a person's "association" with a gang as criminal evidence feels so complicated to me. How can you really prove someone's involvement just by being in the same place as someone else, their appearance, presence in a photo, etc.? The authors make a strong point that association with gang members is not an effective predictor of membership. So, how do investigators walk this fine line and avoid misunderstandings/false accusations? #so339

This article discusses a lot about social media serving as a tool for law enforcement. It made me question how my experience with media growing up differs from individuals in low-income populations. I received a lot of information and education about digital footprints growing up, and I was taught about why we need to be cautious about what we put on the internet. How might certain communities lack this education and how does it impact their experiences? #so339

Stuart mentioned many insightful interventions in his conclusion, but one that really stuck out to me was targeting youth before they turn to drill production. It is so important to be proactive with social issues. Providing kids with safe spaces and artistic outlets before they turn to dangerous attention-seeking practices seems effective. However, I imagine that this is really challenges as it requires a lot of financing and resources many of these communities already lack. #so339