Where is “nothing is real, but good luck making use of that information”?

Littrell noted the workers who participated in the study all came from highly educated backgrounds in HR, accounting, marketing and finance, had bachelor’s degrees and even PhDs, which shows the findings go beyond simply assessing the intelligence of the study participants.

Actually, I’m not convinced that we’ve managed to eliminate that hypothesis. The only group that gives me pause is accounting.

It also says “never”, but yeah, it’s a pretty bland statement when you put the context back in (literally and figuratively).

Holy hell, the fact that those slack messages and that chatbot history ended up in court is mind blowing. I guess we should be grateful that this time, the bad guy and his hamfisted “Project X” got put in the spotlight.

Yep, you and I are operating in orthogonal spaces. I genuinely envy you.

Haha, yeah I use it as well, and like I said it makes drafting the code a lot faster, but it dramatically slows down review and validation of fit for the business purpose.

If I could, I’d put the genie back in the bottle because having ICs dump thousand line MRs on each other and then finding out in gamma that it didn’t actually solve the problem is a ton worse than making a person actually think about what they’re gonna commit for a couple hours. But alas, if we don’t take a first draft with Claude or Gemini agentic tools for every ticket we’ll get PIP’d, so I guess the AI enthusiasts and their sponsors are happy.

I think that newer models of Claude are a lot better, but they are still just chatbots and they still just generate words. As anyone in the industry will tell you: typing out the code was never the slow part.

Attorney-Client Privilege. Sorry, I should have just said it.

For anyone who might have avoided this part of the world, ACP makes communications between you and your counsel inadmissible in court. In big companies, it’s somewhat common to bring lawyers into discussions under the auspices of seeking legal advice, but primarily to ensure that if any artifact from that discussion were to be uncovered by an adversary, it couldn’t be used in a lawsuit.

That’s an impressive investigation.

It would be tough to find a better example of why lobbying in the US is fundamentally broken. An entity like Meta has ample funding to break up an operation into distinct cells that do not directly interact in public forums, while tracking the whole process in documents protected by ACP. I think it’s particularly telling that Meta lobbyists are quietly nodding along legislation pushed by “grass roots” activists and that Meta’s new OS just happens to implement the technology exactly as described in the law.

It’s that sort of coordinated effort that the RICO act was drafted specifically to address, but it’s perfectly legal.

You might read this article initially thinking it is just the US snubbing Ukraine yet again, but the real answer is laid out in black and white if you read further:

An Iranian Shahed is said to cost $20,000 to $50,000, depending on the model. The Ukrainian interceptors are even cheaper. Concerns about intercepting such a cheap, simple target with a multimillion-dollar munition spiked during U.S. fights against Houthi rebels in Yemen, and have remained high since.

You can practically hear the US MIC breathing heavily in the gallery during these talks. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan transferred trillions from US taxpayers to military contractors over 20 years, but a belligerent the size of Iran with modern warfare techniques could realize that dream again in 5.