#waffle1441 2/5
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ ๐ฉโญ๐ฉโฌ๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ ๐ฉโฌ๐ฉโญ๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
๐ฅ streak: 1 wafflegame.net
Connections
Puzzle #935
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
๐จ๐จ๐จ๐จ
๐ช๐ช๐ช๐ช
๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฆ
SKY โ TEAM [๐ฏ]
Raddle #289 โข Dec 10, 2025
๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข๐ข
Shuffalo, 2m 08s
๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ
I think they mean usingbcurl to grab something and piping the output to bash so it it executed locally.
And it is pretty common. Things like ohmyzsh use it. I find it scary because youโre running things direct from the web without any package signature architecture. I would trust the omz people but what if their GitHub was compromised? But donโt check any of the source? No. I donโt anyway, but with a bit of fear :/
RADDLE โข Aug 12 100%
DOGS โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโฃ WAR raddle.quest
I think the problem is that the law is likely to be applied differently to big organisations compared to individuals or smaller organisations, and that the intended purpose of copyright is mostly forgotten.
It was meant to protect creators ability to earn from what they produce for a while so that they would be encouraged to create and share with the world.
Big orgs monopolising access to scientific writing is not what it was for, and it definitely was not meant to have exceptions that let big orgs ignore the rights if creators in order to build software that then endangers the ability of individual creators to earn from what they create.