0 Followers
0 Following
6 Posts
Me: http://www.welton.it/davidw/

Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/davidwelton.bsky.social

Email: [email protected]

Book reviews: http://davids-book-reviews.blogspot.com
This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.

Officialhttps://
Support this servicehttps://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup
If you turn on the thing that shows 'dead' comments, there is a larger than normal number here.

NIMBYs exist throughout the US, even in states without Prop 13 or similar things.

Some of them are even renters.

No one is trying to conceal the problems with unfair tax systems - indeed, the people who spend time advocating for housing are probably your most likely allies in trying to fix it.

The problem in San Francisco is NIMBYism, where supposed 'socialists' try and stop purely below market rate housing because it's the wrong shape or size or something.

Unless you want to build more sprawl-oriented social housing, you'd still need, in most American cities, to reform zoning codes and building codes (single stair and elevator reform) to get Vienna style social housing.

It's a "yes, and" problem though, mostly. Let the market build what it can, and if you want to pursue social housing, do that too - just don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good and delay the reforms while you try and put together all the social housing pieces.

This seems like a pretty reasonable approach that charts a course between skepticism and "it's a miracle".

I wonder how much all this costs on a monthly basis?

Because they are, to use a technical term, "dumb as a stump". That's why they would participate despite not having any inside knowledge.