Cowgirlcoder

@cowgirlcoder
349 Followers
769 Following
370 Posts
Programmer, baker of bread, pasta and cookies, company gofer. On the internet since before there was an internet...
Website:https://www.cowgirlcoder.com/recipes/

Holy crap! The Gaia space telescope is expected to find 120,000 ± 22,000 planets orbiting other stars! Most will be super-Jupiters, because those are the easiest to find. But we'll know much more about other worlds than we do now.

The mission ran from 2014 to March 2025, orbiting at the Earth-Moon Lagrange point L2. It collected huge amounts of data. They repeatedly measured the positions of over a billion stars - so accurately that they could see a star moving by an amount equal to the size of a pinhead on the Moon, as seen from Earth!

They won't be able to process and release all this data until 2030. But some is already out, and they predict 7,500 ± 2,100 planet discoveries from this first release.

They've also found lots of other great stuff. Like 20 stars moving faster than the Galactic escape velocity: 7 leaving the Milky Way, and 13 approaching the Milky Way, which may have come from other galaxies. Like 4 stars orbiting each other. And like the Gaia-Enceladus population, the remains of a dwarf galaxy that collided with the Milky Way 10 billion years ago.

Despite our many other problems, we're in the golden age of astronomy.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04673

On the Exoplanet Yield of Gaia Astrometry

We re-examine the expected yield of Gaia astrometric planet detections using updated models for giant-planet occurrence, the local stellar population, and Gaia's demonstrated astrometric precision. Our analysis combines a semi-analytic model that clarifies key scaling relations with more realistic Monte Carlo simulations. We predict $7{,}500 \pm 2{,}100$ planet discoveries in the 5-year dataset (DR4) and $120{,}000 \pm 22{,}000$ over the full 10-year mission (DR5), with the dominant error arising from uncertainties in giant-planet occurrence. We evaluate the sensitivity of these forecasts to the detection threshold and the desired precision for measurements of planet masses and orbital parameters. Roughly $1{,}900 \pm 540$ planets in DR4 and $38{,}000 \pm 7{,}300$ planets in DR5 should have masses and orbital periods determined to better than $20$%. Most detections will be super-Jupiters ($3$ - $13 M_{\rm J}$) on $2$ - $5$AU orbits around GKM-type stars ($0.4$ - $1.3 M_\odot$) within $500$ pc. Unresolved binary stars will lead to spurious planet detections, but we estimate that genuine planets will outnumber them by a factor of $5$ or more. An exception is planets around M-dwarfs with $a < 1$AU, for which the false-positive rate is expected to be about $50$%. To support community preparation for upcoming data releases, we provide mock catalogs of Gaia exoplanets and planet-impostor binaries.

arXiv.org
This post explains the nuance in Jackson's order and the situation leading to it -- and that problem remains that the court is on speed dial and its majority will do Trump's bidding (with the occasional face-saving exception, possibly including tariffs).
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf
190. SNAP WTF?

A very quick explainer on why Justice Jackson issued an "administrative stay" in the SNAP case late on Friday night, and on what's likely to happen next

One First

GLOBAL WARMING 2025

Iranian television yesterday showcased the deteriorating condition of the country’s water dams amid an ongoing crisis of water - and energy in general.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said yesterday:
“If it doesn’t rain in the coming weeks, we will have to impose water rationing in Tehran - and if it still doesn’t rain, we will have to evacuate Tehran.”
#AureFreePress #News #press #headline #GlobalWarming #climatechange #climatecrisis #Iran

@luckytran @aardvark If I manage to find the owners, I’ll definitely send them a note. And it’ll be about more than their poor grammar. :-(
@luckytran Does anybody have an email for this place’s management?
@dogzilla It’s a deal, let me know if you’re ever on the Left Coast of the States & my husband and I’ll buy you a drink and talk about when the modems sang. :-) Or I will anyway, his engineering degree doesn’t seem to translate into computer knowledge. :-)
I see both sides of ads, I’m an advertiser myself and I DETEST the way the current Real Time Bidding system works and I FERVENTLY believe Google (and the other big corps) should be broken up!
@jaredwhite @dogzilla Would love to sit down over a beverage with you some day and discuss the current online advertising environment. Once ads come into the picture, I firmly believe ALL privacy goes out the window, regardless of what anybody says. I’ve been following ads/marketing/retargeting/SEO since 2010 and I’ve been watching Google with great interest since well before their IPO.
@jaredwhite @dogzilla I’m an old cynic, and I say “I’ve been online since before there was an internet.” Which is a bit sarcastic but also happens to be true. I know Apple’s reputation, and I trust them more than most. But I also believe the marketers and data trawlers tend to win out in the end, absent some VERY strong legal protections. Which don’t exist in the US, sadly.
@dogzilla @jaredwhite
Maybe my knee-jerk anti-AI stance is blinding me. <shrug> I don’t like AI taking over my devices, my social networks, the way I interact with the web. I especially don’t like being required to opt-out. But I’m not sure what part of that message you are disputing. Can you elaborate? Do you trust Google NOT to trawl thru data on its hardware?
@dyani Transcripts on all audio & video material. I’m not deaf (yet anyway) but I can read many times faster than people can talk. Don’t waste my time.