"Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order" by Ray Dalio 🍿

| https://www.linkedin.com/in/serkanholat | |
| Bluesky | https://bsky.app/profile/coni2k.bsky.social |
| GitHub | https://github.com/coni2k |
"Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order" by Ray Dalio 🍿

Crucially, this levy would apply equally to providers based abroad, creating a level playing field within the European market and ensuring that foreign AI companies also contribute when they operate here. The proceeds would flow into a central European fund dedicated to investing in new content creation, and supporting Europe’s cultural sectors."
3/3
"At Mistral, we are proposing a revenue-based levy that would be applied to all commercial providers placing AI models on the market or putting them into service in Europe, reflecting their use of content publicly available online.
2/3
"Mistral CEO: AI companies should pay a content levy in Europe" by Arthur Mensch đź’Ż
https://www.ft.com/content/d63d6291-687f-4e05-8b23-4d545d78c64a
1/3
"Just as society doesn’t rely on voluntary contributions to maintain roads or power grids, it cannot leave the digital infrastructure underpinning a significant proportion of the economy to the goodwill of a handful of maintainers."
"Open source is a civic resource and a public good. Let's make sure it's treated like one."
5/5
"The policy imperative is clear: treating open source as a public good means establishing sustainable funding mechanisms, creating liability frameworks that don’t burden volunteers, supporting security audits for critical projects, and ensuring that the $8.8 trillion in annual value creation doesn’t collapse due to market failure."
4/
This creates what economists call a “tragedy of the commons” scenario: everyone benefits from open source, but without coordinated protection, the resource faces depletion through maintainer burnout, security vulnerabilities, and project abandonment. The free-rider problem inherent to public goods means that rational economic actors will continue consuming open source value without contributing to its sustainability, necessitating policy intervention."
3/
(Fixing the thread 🤷🏻‍♀️)
"This vulnerability [in Log4j] existed in software maintained by a handful of volunteers, highlighting the dangerous asymmetry between open source’s economic importance and its resource allocation. In fact, the Harvard study found that just 5% of developers create 95% of open source’s economic value, yet most work without compensation or institutional support.
2/
Open Source as Critical Infrastructure - A White Paper by Block, Inc., with input from the Open Source Initiative đź’Ż
https://opensource.block.xyz/blog/open-source-critical-infra-whitepaper/
1/