| Website | evo-eco.org/ |
| github | github.com/cbedwards |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SI50LP8AAAAJ |
| Website | evo-eco.org/ |
| github | github.com/cbedwards |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SI50LP8AAAAJ |
Next programmed event for @rladiesrome:
Title: Debugging in R
Speaker: Shannon Pileggi - @PipingHotData
When: Feb 20th 6.15pm CET
RSVP: https://www.meetup.com/rladies-rome/events/298710129/
#rladies #rstats #debugging #datascience
Tip of the Day!
Here is a reminder to everyone [rightly] pissed at the incredibly high cost of peer-reviewed journal articles behind paywalls:
If you send an email to the lead/corresponding author (whose contact is almost always provided in the article, or easily found with google) and ask for a copy of the article, the author will almost universally be delighted to send a copy [legally] to you, free.
We authors LOVE it when someone asks for a copy of our articles!!!
I'm excited to share a preprint of my work identifying statistical methods for modeling butterfly populations in #ecology and #conservation. I developed guidelines for fitting sparse transect monitoring data with Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), based in large part on a new #Rstats package I developed to simulate and fit realistic butterfly data.
@gavinsimpson @noamross This is awesome!! Thanks for all the help!
We're already doing comparisons with AIC, and the differences are quite large. I was just thinking providing a reasonable P value might help with the review process. So I'm not super worried that the P values are biased towards being low.