RE @_nicula @ThePrimeagen: Yes. 2023-05-07 04:12:30 UTC

RE @freejosebreton @ziggidityziggy @Astr0nomics: Thanks! 2023-05-05 09:22:05 UTC

RE @freejosebreton @ziggidityziggy @Astr0nomics: That is not why. We do it that way because that is how the parser works: int* a, b; This makes it look like a and b are both pointers. But they aren't. A is a pointer, b is not. That's why, to the extent there is a "correct" way, it would be: int *a, b; 2023-05-05 09:20:17 UTC

RE @cmuratori @isaac_hagoel @Jonathan_Blow: I tried to explain my position many times throughout this thread, and looking back at them, I think they are very clear. That it was apparently all a waste of time is what it is. How about we just agree that we don't need to talk to each other anymore and call it day? 2023-05-05 08:38:55 UTC

RE @ivereadthesql @ThePrimeagen: OMFG I forgot I said that. "All you should have to do to turn a meal into what it's made out of is cross the 'l'." 2023-05-05 06:52:28 UTC

RE @freejosebreton @ziggidityziggy @Astr0nomics: It's "incorrect" for C/C++ (the parser works the other way). 2023-05-05 07:39:51 UTC

RE @isaac_hagoel @Jonathan_Blow: So the implication here is that I said something that only Jon said, and that I never said, because I made a joke about it? Are you serious? 2023-05-05 08:01:50 UTC

RE @isaac_hagoel @Jonathan_Blow: What kind of an apology is that, though? "I took your humor as support but if I got it wrong"? You literally said, "You started off saying it's never useful and that people who use it can't program". Now we're at "I interpreted a joke as you saying the words Jon said"? 2023-05-05 08:38:06 UTC

RE @isaac_hagoel @Jonathan_Blow: WTF are you talking about? Can you link me to the tweet where I said anything like that at all? 2023-05-05 06:31:30 UTC

RE @neontunnel: You have no idea what you're talking about. 2023-05-05 06:25:37 UTC