Where Chuck once stood, only I will remain.

71 Followers
206 Following
991 Posts
Renaissance man. Dad. Pirate. I dreamt I was a Big10 CISO once.
GitHubhttps://github.com/chux0r
Blueskyhttps://bsky.app/profile/chux0r.bsky.social
XwitterNo://abandoned.dont.go.there

I think it's good to periodically get a brand new half-configured/somewhat misconfigured workstation from the kids in workstation support. Fixing it up and in doing so, then discovering and breaking new things I never wanted and didn't ask for keeps me on my toes.

Now if they just would stop telling me they can't connect my Model M because it isn't USB, that'd be great.

How long does it take to finish a bucket of this stuff? 11 years, apparently. (Also, fuck Nestlé, don't buy this stuff.)
Miss you buddy. This place definitely ain't the same.
Getting pushed out hurts like hell.
It's hotdog day today. Do you know why?
Because we deserve the wurst?
<groans> No! What's wrong with you?
Tip your waitresses, try the veal. <ducks>
Poaching and baking, done! Bootiful. "Pump 'er? I hardly even know 'er." If I had a nickel for every time someone used that joke...
16 in the fridge for an overnight prove
Rolling out the pumpernickel bagels. Mmm yeah

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: if Microsoft could please stop controlling vulnerability mitigation features using longer and longer binary flags, I would be so happy.

The historic and continuing method employed by Microsoft is shoehorning as many feature flags into a single registry value as possible. Any human wishing to understand this has to do hex/dec to binary conversions on the fly to even have a chance of reading it, and maybe then looking up what is enabled or disabled.

Registry values, last time I checked, were free. Instead of cramming it all into a single decimal registry value 2347624 (or whatever) representing a row of switches like 1000111101001001101000, Microsoft could simply have 23 sensibly-named registry values in the same place, each with a human-readable name, and a sensible human-readable value.

Worse: if you want to programmatically assess mitigation status, you not only have to account for the current state of things, but for the potential for new stuff be to added to the existing registry value.

Whoever at Microsoft keeps inflicting the hard way on the rest of us, please make yourself known. I just want to talk!

WhatsApp *seems* OK. What compromises the idea for me is that it is still manipulable by Facebook/Meta/ZuckerMAGArg.

How great am I supposed to feel about a "secure, privacy-forward" product stewarded by an oligarch and his megacorp? They exploit everything they can to wring out 2 things: Money and control.

Even if it is miraculously somehow "ok", that can certainly change without notice, and it's still a vote for the detestable in the meanwhile. IMHO.