- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 1 Posts
It is true, unfortunately.
Mozilla now sells your data.
They literally removed the “we don’t sell your data” promise from their FAQ a few weeks ago.
The Google app is often used as a browser by the tech-illiterate.
It even has tabs.
This is how my grandparents use it.
Ha, I see.
Yeah, sarcasm over text forums is sometimes difficult to pick up on.
You are wrong.
DRY has been applied to written code at least since the book Clean Code, which has been widely recommended to programmers for nearly two decades.
I’m not making a stance here about whether or not that is the right recommendation, but saying that DRY was never meant to be applied to “the code you write” is simply wrong.
(I remember DRY being pushed before that book, but it’s the only primary source I have at this moment.)
To be clear, the right of free speech given in the first amendment is the right to express any opinion without fear of repercussions.
There is no inherent right that your opinions must be given a platform, or that any particular platform has the right to exist.
The first amendment is entirely orthogonal to the question of whether or not TikTok should be allowed to operate in the US.
So you’re telling me that there was a Mac super computer in '05?
The EU gave Google an option: pay or take down the content. The latter option was a bluff, and Google called them on it.
I don’t think this will hurt Google at all.
But it will certainly drive less traffic to these news sites if they are banned from Google. And that will hurt the news sites.
EU: You have to pay to show our news.
Google: Ok. We won’t show your news.
EU: Pikachu face
I mean, they don’t have to release the source code. A compiled version would be fine.
Why?
Because I have YT Premium.
The first party app is pretty good in this case. No ads. Supports offline downloads, including auto-downloading videos from your subscriptions. The search is obviously good, because Google.