Neurobiology professor hit and killed by a car that did not stop in an intersection. Driver charged with a misdemeanor.
Neurobiology professor hit and killed by a car that did not stop in an intersection. Driver charged with a misdemeanor.
Brushing teeth before going to the dentist has the same motivator as shaving pubes before going to the gynecologist: If someone's going to be looking inside there, you want it to look nice.
Wake up fam, two new genders just dropped
He's in the weather patterns
Trump fulfilled his "drill, baby, drill" promise, just not in the way that his supporters expected or hoped
Trump administration orders sweeping freeze of federal aid
This pauses disbursement of all federal loans and prohibits new scientific grant funding indefinitely. As written, this appears to apply to student loans, as those are disbursed via universities–not directly from the Dept of Education. It explicitly requires cancellation of awarded scientific grant funding that is in conflict with the current administration.
I will find rule
Outstde rule
The old primary argument against panpsychism has now become the primary argument for it
Panpsychism is the idea that everything is conscious to some degree (which, to be clear, isn’t what I think). In the past, the common response to the idea was, “So, rocks are conscious?” This argument was meant to illustrate the absurdity of panpsychism. Now, we have made rocks represent pins and switches, enabling us to use them as computers. We made them complex enough that we developed neural networks and created large language models–the most complex of which have nodes that represent space, time, and the abstraction of truth, according to some papers. So many people are convinced these things are conscious, which has many suggesting that everything may be conscious to some degree. In other words, the possibility of rocks being conscious is now commonly used to argue in favor of panpsychism, when previously it was used to argue against it.
Peer review can be fun