1.1K Followers
1.2K Following
2.1K Posts
Writing on the origins of complexity, selfhood, modern cognition and suffering, philosophy, history of science, literature, film.
Podcasthttps://anchor.fm/bkam
Bloghttps://bit.ly/3EYzjGM
Websitehttps://bryankam.com
Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/bryankam

Most people aren't Platonists. And yet...

"Capitalism is ruining the world." "I can't do that because of my anxiety."

These things are real, but treating them as *more* real than experience is what I'm calling Latent Platonism.

Our paper on it here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-06669-3

@philosophy #philosophy @psychology #psychology

Neither/nor: a pragmatic philosophy for oscillating between conceptual and experiential knowledge - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

This paper presents “Neither/Nor,” a philosophical synthesis which defines conceptual and experiential modes of knowing as complementary skills which can be deliberately trained and oscillated. The paper argues that neither theory (concepts) nor practice (experience) alone can suffice for desirable outcomes in personal flourishing or scientific inquiry. Drawing from Western and Eastern philosophical traditions—from ancient skepticism and Buddhism to modern pragmatism and cognitive science—Neither/Nor proposes that “latent Platonism,” the unconscious preference for abstract concepts over direct experience, contributes to both personal suffering and intellectual impasses. The paper begins with a concrete example of Type I diabetes management, demonstrating the constant negotiation between abstract formulas and embodied experience required by the disease, before providing five practical principles: (1) regard concepts and experience as trainable skills; (2) commit to oscillation between skills; (3) prioritize relations and processes over objects and states; (4) embrace trial-and-error learning; and (5) employ conditional historicism over linear causal thinking. The Neither/Nor framework demonstrates how these principles can reduce personal suffering, enhance scientific inquiry, and provide a methodology for evaluating diverse philosophical positions pragmatically. Neither/Nor points towards a way of living rather than merely an abstract theory, contributing to both individual flourishing and more flexible approaches to complex societal challenges.

Nature

Most people aren't Platonists. And yet...

"Capitalism is ruining the world." "I can't do that because of my anxiety."

These things are real, but treating them as *more* real than experience is what I'm calling Latent Platonism.

Our paper on it here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-06669-3

@philosophy #philosophy @psychology #psychology

Neither/nor: a pragmatic philosophy for oscillating between conceptual and experiential knowledge - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

This paper presents “Neither/Nor,” a philosophical synthesis which defines conceptual and experiential modes of knowing as complementary skills which can be deliberately trained and oscillated. The paper argues that neither theory (concepts) nor practice (experience) alone can suffice for desirable outcomes in personal flourishing or scientific inquiry. Drawing from Western and Eastern philosophical traditions—from ancient skepticism and Buddhism to modern pragmatism and cognitive science—Neither/Nor proposes that “latent Platonism,” the unconscious preference for abstract concepts over direct experience, contributes to both personal suffering and intellectual impasses. The paper begins with a concrete example of Type I diabetes management, demonstrating the constant negotiation between abstract formulas and embodied experience required by the disease, before providing five practical principles: (1) regard concepts and experience as trainable skills; (2) commit to oscillation between skills; (3) prioritize relations and processes over objects and states; (4) embrace trial-and-error learning; and (5) employ conditional historicism over linear causal thinking. The Neither/Nor framework demonstrates how these principles can reduce personal suffering, enhance scientific inquiry, and provide a methodology for evaluating diverse philosophical positions pragmatically. Neither/Nor points towards a way of living rather than merely an abstract theory, contributing to both individual flourishing and more flexible approaches to complex societal challenges.

Nature

I’ve had a lot of pain in my life as a diabetic — 4 injections a day from age 2, seizures throughout childhood.

But on reflection, I’d still say that most of my suffering has come from my thinking — overthinking, and wishing things were other than they are.

My paper with @IsabelaG is out. We diagnose this problem as "latent Platonism," which causes suffering. The cure is oscillation: the skill of switching between thinking and experience. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-06669-3 #philosophy @philosophy

Neither/nor: a pragmatic philosophy for oscillating between conceptual and experiential knowledge - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

This paper presents “Neither/Nor,” a philosophical synthesis which defines conceptual and experiential modes of knowing as complementary skills which can be deliberately trained and oscillated. The paper argues that neither theory (concepts) nor practice (experience) alone can suffice for desirable outcomes in personal flourishing or scientific inquiry. Drawing from Western and Eastern philosophical traditions—from ancient skepticism and Buddhism to modern pragmatism and cognitive science—Neither/Nor proposes that “latent Platonism,” the unconscious preference for abstract concepts over direct experience, contributes to both personal suffering and intellectual impasses. The paper begins with a concrete example of Type I diabetes management, demonstrating the constant negotiation between abstract formulas and embodied experience required by the disease, before providing five practical principles: (1) regard concepts and experience as trainable skills; (2) commit to oscillation between skills; (3) prioritize relations and processes over objects and states; (4) embrace trial-and-error learning; and (5) employ conditional historicism over linear causal thinking. The Neither/Nor framework demonstrates how these principles can reduce personal suffering, enhance scientific inquiry, and provide a methodology for evaluating diverse philosophical positions pragmatically. Neither/Nor points towards a way of living rather than merely an abstract theory, contributing to both individual flourishing and more flexible approaches to complex societal challenges.

Nature

I’ve had a lot of pain in my life as a diabetic — 4 injections a day from age 2, seizures throughout childhood.

But on reflection, I’d still say that most of my suffering has come from my thinking — overthinking, and wishing things were other than they are.

My paper with @IsabelaG is out. We diagnose this problem as "latent Platonism," which causes suffering. The cure is oscillation: the skill of switching between thinking and experience. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-06669-3 #philosophy @philosophy

Neither/nor: a pragmatic philosophy for oscillating between conceptual and experiential knowledge - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

This paper presents “Neither/Nor,” a philosophical synthesis which defines conceptual and experiential modes of knowing as complementary skills which can be deliberately trained and oscillated. The paper argues that neither theory (concepts) nor practice (experience) alone can suffice for desirable outcomes in personal flourishing or scientific inquiry. Drawing from Western and Eastern philosophical traditions—from ancient skepticism and Buddhism to modern pragmatism and cognitive science—Neither/Nor proposes that “latent Platonism,” the unconscious preference for abstract concepts over direct experience, contributes to both personal suffering and intellectual impasses. The paper begins with a concrete example of Type I diabetes management, demonstrating the constant negotiation between abstract formulas and embodied experience required by the disease, before providing five practical principles: (1) regard concepts and experience as trainable skills; (2) commit to oscillation between skills; (3) prioritize relations and processes over objects and states; (4) embrace trial-and-error learning; and (5) employ conditional historicism over linear causal thinking. The Neither/Nor framework demonstrates how these principles can reduce personal suffering, enhance scientific inquiry, and provide a methodology for evaluating diverse philosophical positions pragmatically. Neither/Nor points towards a way of living rather than merely an abstract theory, contributing to both individual flourishing and more flexible approaches to complex societal challenges.

Nature
On revision

Five reviews

Clerestory
On revision

Five reviews

Clerestory

I've released a new podcast with Brook Ziporyn on the value paradox, ontological ambiguity, and how grammar shapes metaphysics. We explore how making values explicit causes them to undermine themselves—from the Daodejing's "when all recognize the good as good, there is the bad" through Buddhist emptiness to Spinoza's critique of teleology. Plus: why "samsara is nirvana."

https://www.bryankam.com/p/samsara-is-nirvana-with-brook-ziporyn
#Buddhism #Tiantai #Daoism #Spinoza #Nietzsche #Metaphysics #Philosophy @philosophy

Samsara Is Nirvana, with Brook Ziporyn

Daoism, Buddhism, Spinozism, and Mystical Atheism

Clerestory

I've released a new podcast with Brook Ziporyn on the value paradox, ontological ambiguity, and how grammar shapes metaphysics. We explore how making values explicit causes them to undermine themselves—from the Daodejing's "when all recognize the good as good, there is the bad" through Buddhist emptiness to Spinoza's critique of teleology. Plus: why "samsara is nirvana."

https://www.bryankam.com/p/samsara-is-nirvana-with-brook-ziporyn
#Buddhism #Tiantai #Daoism #Spinoza #Nietzsche #Metaphysics #Philosophy @philosophy

Samsara Is Nirvana, with Brook Ziporyn

Daoism, Buddhism, Spinozism, and Mystical Atheism

Clerestory
The Math is Not the Territory

Mathematics, anti-realism, and Buddhism

Clerestory