| Official | https:// |
| Support this service | https://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup |
> And I do want to stress that. There is a frequent mistake, often from folks who deal in economics, to assume that countries will give up on wars when the economics turn bad. But countries are often very willing to throw good money after bad even on distant wars of choice.
On the other hand isn't this how the russian revolution happened? An economic crisis due to a prolonged war leading to a revolution? While i wouldn't bet money on it, it seems at least possible that something similar could happen to Iran.
> I won’t deny that there is some stigma around being overweight from some people, but I’ve also rarely seen a person change only their weight.
This feels like it could be a correlation vs causation thing. Its a lot easier to put effort in if you see it getting results. Is it that they suddenly put effort in triggering all this or is it the weighg loss made the investment of putting effort in return results where previously you'd need a much higher level of effort to see results making it only seem worth it after the weight loss?
Or is it the weight loss resulted in higher self confidence giving all sorts of knock on effects.
I think its really hard to tease apart cause and effect here. Would the same changes be possible without the weight loss or have the sane results is kind of a hard question to answer.
> * This seems to reveal previously-unknown range of Iranian ballistic missiles and, if true, could touch basically all of Europe?
The Wikipedia article has said they had missiles that can range 4300km since 2019 (as in the article was updated in 2019) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shahab-5&oldid=91... . If Wikipedia has known about it for 7 years, surely military planners were already aware.
So at what point does us bond ratings go down and cost of borrowing becomes problematic?
I know us is buyoed by the petrodollar, but surely that only goes so far.
Well yes, the entire point of a private relay is to make it impossible for websites to be able to distinguish between you and a spammer.
There are exceptions to this policy, but you generally need to have a really good pre-existing reputation to qualify https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IP_block_exemption
Sometimes yes, but usually not at a mass range level except in extreme circumstances.
The block in this case appears to be this one: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalBlockList?targ...
In that specific case, logged in users are still allowed, however you cannot create new accounts when visiting from that range, so you have to already have an account, or go somewhere else to create one.
The error message blocked users get should link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Advice_to_T-Mobile_I... with more info on how to still edit.
Typically this just means you have to create an account.
Mobile ips are often blocked because of the sheer amount of spam and they switch so much that its difficult to block individual offenders.