Autonomous User

0 Followers
0 Following
2 Posts

Lead Lemmy developer [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns

https://lemmy.world/post/44078413

Lead Lemmy developer [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns - Lemmy.World

Cross posted here as suggested in the comments. It was highlighted that the individual is a lead Lemmy developer, raising serious concerns about the direction of Lemmy, a leading Fediverse platform, and the impact on future user adoption. Hi There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] community, [email protected] [[email protected]]. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. 1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4: > If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity. 2. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given. 3. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] but several completely unrelated communities: - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices. 4. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given. Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening? TL;DR: Admin [email protected] [[email protected]] of [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated. Cross post with https://lemmy.world/post/43978041 [https://lemmy.world/post/43978041]

Lead Lemmy developer [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns

https://lemmy.world/post/43978041

Lead Lemmy developer [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns - Lemmy.World

Cross posted here as it was highlighted that the individual is a lead Lemmy developer, raising serious concerns about the direction of Lemmy, a leading Fediverse platform, and the impact on future user adoption. Hi There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] community, [email protected] [[email protected]]. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. 1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4: > If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity. 2. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given. 3. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] but several completely unrelated communities: - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices. 4. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given. Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening? TL;DR: Admin [email protected] [[email protected]] of [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated. Cross post with https://lemmy.world/post/43944126 [https://lemmy.world/post/43944126]

Admin [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns

https://lemmy.world/post/43944126

Admin [email protected] Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns - Lemmy.World

Here since [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] is unavailable as outlined below. Hi There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] community, [email protected] [[email protected]]. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. 1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4: > If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity. 2. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]], despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given. 3. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] but several completely unrelated communities: - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] - [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices. 4. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given. Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening? TL;DR: Admin [email protected] [[email protected]] of [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate. Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated.

What You Don't Know About SAINSBURY'S and the AI BIOMETRIC PANOPTICON

https://lemmy.world/post/43925410

What You Don't Know About SAINSBURY'S and the AI BIOMETRIC PANOPTICON - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

"Sideloading" is Double Speak – Say this: App Stores Are the Real Threat, Cuckloading

https://lemmy.world/post/43925393

"Sideloading" is Double Speak – Say this: App Stores Are the Real Threat, Cuckloading - Lemmy.World

This is a repost as, despite receiving many positive votes and comments, the original guide has been removed under Rule 4: > If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered Reposts are fine Clearly, this is a guide, not a question, so the above rule does not apply. The removal appears to be an error. The moderator was notified but has failed to respond, despite activity being visible on their account. — “Sideloading” is framed as some privacy hack but it’s just double speak. App stores? They are an excuse to steal our control, spy on us, destroy our privacy, all while lying, pretending to protect us, deceiving us. F-Droid? That is a library, not a store. Stop falling for this scam. Fight fire with fire. Call app stores what they are: Cuckloading! Example > Google’s forcing us into cuckloading all apps.

"Sideloading" is Double Speak – Say this: App Stores Are the Real Threat, Cuckloading

https://lemmy.world/post/43797611

"Sideloading" is Double Speak – Say this: App Stores Are the Real Threat, Cuckloading - Lemmy.World

“Sideloading” is framed as some privacy hack, but it’s just double speak. App stores? They are an excuse to steal our control, spy on us, destroy our privacy, all while lying, pretending to protect us, deceiving us. F-Droid? That is a library, not a store. Stop falling for this scam. Fight fire with fire. Call app stores what they are: Cuckloading! Example > You really cuckload all your apps? lmao. You should…

Signal needs a phone number. Why are we dismissing this as privacy versus anonymity when governments are blocking the registration SMS?

https://lemmy.world/post/35730511

Signal needs a phone number. Why are we dismissing this as privacy versus anonymity when governments are blocking the registration SMS? - Lemmy.World

I really don’t get why so many people are turning this into a privacy versus anonymity debate when the real problem is censorship. Yes, Signal needs a phone number to sign up, but replacing that with an email or username doesn’t make it anonymous. The real issue is that governments are blocking the registration SMS, so people can’t even sign up for the app in the first place. Sure, there are workarounds, but most people aren’t going to jump through all those extra hoops just to use an app. If we want to spread privacy, how do we do that when Signal’s phone number requirement is actively working against us? Instead of arguing over privacy versus anonymity, shouldn’t we focus on making sure everyone can access Signal without issues? What do you think?

Why is it so hard to get friends to leave Discord, WhatsApp, Instagram, and others? Anyone else feel this?

https://lemmy.world/post/35580750

Why is it so hard to get friends to leave Discord, WhatsApp, Instagram, and others? Anyone else feel this? - Lemmy.World

I’ve been seeing this more and more in comments, and it’s got me wondering just how big this issue really is. A lot of people feel trapped in apps like Discord, WhatsApp, and Instagram, but can’t get their friends to leave. It’s really annoying when you suggest trying something new, whether it’s a different app or just not using these platforms so much but sometimes it can feel like no one wants to go first. So I’m curious, what apps do you feel most trapped in? And have you tried convincing your friends to leave them? What happened? Is it an issue for you, or are you just going along with the flow? Looking forward to hearing if this is as common as it feels!

[WARNING] Open WebUI removes its libre software license

https://lemmy.world/post/30492073

[WARNING] Open WebUI removes its libre software license - Lemmy.World

They cry when companies profit from their work, while ignoring the most blatant solution from the start: the AGPL. Now, its libre software license text file has been replaced with a fake, banning us users from freely forking new versions. > Open WebUI v0.6.6+ … now adds a … branding … clause. > The original BSD-3 license continues to apply for all contributions made to the codebase up to and including release v0.6.5.

P2P voice chat with push-to-talk (for gaming)?

https://lemmy.world/post/29237449

P2P voice chat with push-to-talk (for gaming)? - Lemmy.World

Peer-to-peer as it’s easier to say ‘get an app’ over ‘get a server’. Must be libre software and E2EE too, obviously.