Tooting personally.
| pronouns | he / him /his |
| pronouns | he / him /his |
Patrick McGee on X: "The first time I heard the name "Homer Sarasohn," it was an ex-@apple engineer telling me there should bronze statues of the guy in Apple Park, Cupertino.
"These ideas didn't come out of nowhere," the source said, when I asked about Apple's supply chain strategy. "It all goes https://t.co/wqPZe7Zl74" / X https://x.com/PatrickMcGee_/status/2039577362602537308?s=20

The first time I heard the name "Homer Sarasohn," it was an ex-@Apple engineer telling me there should bronze statues of the guy in Apple Park, Cupertino. "These ideas didn't come out of nowhere," the source said, when I asked about Apple's supply chain strategy. "It all goes

Abdul AzizStrategy & Performance through Empathy, Architecture and AnalyticsMarch 28, 2026 The systems framing: Beyond the 2×2 and why Operating Model Design needs Cybernetic First Principles |…

OK, you got me. That post earlier was an April Fool’s. But there was a true element: I have received some funding, and I’m entering a new phase of work. I’m grateful to have been awarded a grant by the Late Phase Research Foundation, which specialises in identifying individuals who begin exhibiting late-career characteristics, and supporting them to formalise these tendencies before they become socially disruptive. I believe they’ve been around for some time. In my case, the panel noted: • a deepening preoccupation with 1970s cyberneticians, philosophers, and therapists whose work improves with obscurity • a drift from ‘projects’ to ‘questions’, and from questions to ‘what is going on, really?’ • a growing tolerance for diagrams that attempt to explain everything • consistent beard maturation (despite active countermeasures) • interests that have become simultaneously narrower, stranger, and more ambitious The Foundation’s purpose is straightforward: to support the transition from delivery to synthesis - reconciling governance, state and system, cybernetics and metaphysics, public service and the noumenal. My own directions of travel, for now: • connecting public service transformation with second-order cybernetics and political economy • taking systems seriously enough to ask what kind of reality they imply • and testing whether anything useful sits between institutional practice and whatever passes for wisdom There are, as ever, conditions. These include: • a spiritual ‘journey’ (I’m told ‘journey’ will become quite a theme!), requiring a plausible spiritual source (shortlisted options currently include second-order cybernetics, obscure strands of Eastern Orthodox thought, deracinated Shamanism, and something half-remembered from Marhsall Berman – anyway – some kind of relationship with a beard-forward wisdom tradition) • producing a Theory of Everything of sufficient coherence to be taken seriously by at least three people and seven podcasts • maintaining light but credible contact with the counterculture as represented by Stewart Brand, Terence McKenna, and, where appropriate, the ghost of Buckminster Fuller - I will be guided in this endeavour by regular sessions with an on-faculty character they call ‘the Central Scrutiniser’, who apparently ‘was there at Esalen’) • and undertaking a modest programme of psychedelic inquiry (psilocybin, LSD, or prolonged exposure to late-period systems literature) I’m a little nervous about the requirement I host ‘live-ins’ in my home (haven’t told my wife yet :-o) but I’m sure it’ll be fine. They send a druid first to balance the ley-lines…. Funding is said to originate from a loose alliance of ageing longhairs, systems mystics, and at least one person who was ‘there at Esalen’. I have not asked further questions. The expectation is clear: less novelty, more synthesis, and a growing willingness to say simple things that turn out not to be simple at all. More… when the energy is right.