Not really disagreeing with you but do note that Hamas was funded by Netanyahu during the time period you’re talking about

So you agree we shouldn’t base our morality on what animals do?

What about that makes you think that the focus is on the chicken

The chicken advertisement link in the description

Okay take my same argument but replace rape with killing their own babies which lions do.

Out of 650,000

just 2,107 accounts that are responsible for 80 percent of the tweets linking to sources of misinformation.

What the fuck?

I think the ethical argument is the strongest.

“animals getting killed is part of the natural cycle”

The 80 billion animals a year we kill are in farms and not part of the natural cycle (96% of the land mammals by weight are human or farmed animals) but if you meant to say there is wild animals that kill other animals and that makes it morally correct then what do you think of lions raping each other? Is that now also morally justified?

Never have been laid off but in theory you could call in sick and they can’t fire you (in my country at least)

I have been taught animals aren’t things, therefore they are not something but someone.

The relevant part is that they have their own conscious experience that you are negatively impacting by killing them, the same reason it is wrong to kill a human.

“The natural order of things” is not a guide for morality; lions rape each other, that is still immoral.

Why do you think that?

There is two promotion urls in the bio, one for sauce and one that goes to “Frozen Meat, Poultry & Seafood” but even if it was not a paid promotion, it is still normalizing the killing of animals