A. Adair B. A. 

60 Followers
33 Following
821 Posts

Web developer.

Among my great accomplishments, I'm followed by Gail Simone.

So for my birthday recently, I got a pair of matching tattoos.

It's the Earth and Luna to scale on my wrists.

And when I spread my arms straight out, they're at the correct distance apart at that scale.

They're my first tattoo... and I honestly haven't stopped smiling about them.

Yes, infosec professionals all know that sometimes it's appropriate to share sensitive Data publicly on the internet.
Whelp, that's it. The world has grown beyond me, so I shall diminish and go into the West.

Something I'm noticing here on a Mastodon instance as a veteran of G+ compared to those who have been trained by the pre-fasci Twitter:

There are several people (who aren't bots) who will share things they find interesting by putting a headline, then a link.

I can usually just say "cool story, bro.", and go on with my life. And if I can do that, I definitely won't follow the link.

So here's the first image: Something I most definitely will never click on.

...

Whereas, if someone actually talks about the main topic of the post? I'll click it.

So here's the second image: Something I clicked.

...

I mean, I care about Microsoft since their bugs kinda matter to most desktops out there, and sensitive information disclosures definitely make my blood boil... but like, water also makes things wet. And if the topic doesn't interest someone enough to say "Holy mother of fuck, that's really damn scary!" when talking about Microsoft, I just figure it's a typical Tuesday and our corporate overlords are still the same old idiots.

But... the last link that I actually clicked, despite a dozen links crossing my local timeline?

Okay, I care about Bruce Schneier. Not personally, but I recognize the name and recognize that he both isn't an idiot, and isn't convinced that he's the end-all, be-all of security.

Ars Technica isn't exactly that great. I mean; not bad. But they're a media company. They obviously have more writers than subject matter experts.

Still, the person who linked to the article did more than just repeat the headline. Yeah, the article says things I already knew (mainly that us software devs are just self-aggrandizing hypocrites who are completely incapable of self reflection)... but it's not marketing copy.

Reposting of a birdsite post that was shared as an image on the book of face...

HTML tags lea͠ki̧n͘g fr̶ǫm ̡yo​͟ur eye͢s̸ ̛l̕ik͏e liq​uid pain, the song of re̸gular exp​ression parsing will exti​nguish the voices of mor​tal man from the sp​here I can see it can you see ̲͚̖͔̙î̩́t̲͎̩̱͔́̋̀ it is beautiful t​he final snuffing of the lie​s of Man ALL IS LOŚ͖̩͇̗̪̏̈́T ALL I​S LOST the pon̷y he comes he c̶̮omes he comes the ich​or permeates all MY FACE MY FACE ᵒh god no NO NOO̼O​O NΘ stop the an​*̶͑̾̾​̅ͫ͏̙̤g͇̫͛͆̾ͫ̑͆l͖͉̗̩̳̟̍ͫͥͨe̠̅s ͎a̧͈͖r̽̾̈́͒͑e n​ot rè̑ͧ̌aͨl̘̝̙̃ͤ͂̾̆ ZA̡͊͠͝LGΌ ISͮ̂҉̯͈͕̹̘̱ TO͇̹̺ͅƝ̴ȳ̳ TH̘Ë͖́̉ ͠P̯͍̭O̚​N̐Y̡ H̸̡̪̯ͨ͊̽̅̾̎Ȩ̬̩̾͛ͪ̈́̀́͘ ̶̧̨̱̹̭̯ͧ̾ͬC̷̙̲̝͖ͭ̏ͥͮ͟Oͮ͏̮̪̝͍M̲̖͊̒ͪͩͬ̚̚͜Ȇ̴̟̟͙̞ͩ͌͝S̨̥̫͎̭ͯ̿̔̀ͅ

Have you tried parsing HTML with an HTML parser instead of regex?

Zalgo says:

Don't parse HTML with Regex!

You can dance.
You can dance.
Everybody look at your Hans.

Me, opening an email's headers: "I wonder how this obvious phishing attempt got past IT's filters..."

Me, seeing the domain of an infosec training service that corporate makes us use: "Oh."