If you’re going to hate Bluesky because you prefer Mastodon that’s fine. Do you.
But it is disingenuous to talk about the ills of Bluesky and ignore the years of poor stewardship, unilateralism and how friendly Mastodon is with centralized platforms despite claiming to build an ethical alternative to them.
Yes, I don’t like Bluesky either, but I’m also a pragmatist.
And a lot of people are just not being honest about the very real and longstanding issues that have been pushing people away from Mastodon for a long time.
I've seen a lot of takes about the latest move to Bluesky. I wanted to try and collect my thoughts about this in one place. I think Bluesky is fascinating, but I also worry about many parts of it. If it becomes the new "Twitter", I think I'm OK with that, but I'll be very quick to cut the cord if it ever starts sucking.
November has sucked so far. One upside of the terrible nonsense is that more people are fleeing X. Many are choosing Bluesky. I’ve seen a bunch of takes about this recently, but I keep seeing things I disagree with. I figure that’s a good enough excuse to write more about this weird-assed social network.
First time trying NotebookLM (public version!) on a book by the historian Alessandro Barbero, and it does a surprising good job at summarizing the key points:
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/d4ae8d8b-5f06-4e6b-a7ed-2ae292263224/audio
The kicker? The book is written in Italian!