Isn’t it also like opt in? If you don’t annotate a type it just defaults to Any, which is just unchecked like standard JS

If it actually looked good sure but it just cranks up the contrast and puts a shitty Instagram filter over the characters. I don’t care how delusional you are I just can’t understand how you’d think that wouldn’t ruin whatever the character is supposed to actually look like. In one of their own examples the character just had a family member die, they aren’t wearing makeup for a reason, not that DLSS cares so yassified grieving woman go brrr

Tell me you haven’t used a back button without telling me.

To TLDR you pretend the back button on android is the back button on your mouse, because it is. Does it seem useful yet?

Nah Ryuko generally just looks different but the easiest one is her hair, she’s got just a red “strand”. Also notable is the outfit, Ryuko wouldn’t wear anything with that neck thing going on

What about the borrow checker needs an overhaul? Seems to do it’s job quite well. If you want to remove it then you should use like C++ or Zig or something since the borrow checker is fairly fundemenal to the design of the language

Yeah but that’d take effort and care about their work

If I could trust that the people in government know how computers work I’d be down but well I can’t

As a Gen z who managed to not be an idiot I’m unconvinced it’s the technology when even in my elementary school years I was beginning to realize how shit the school system is. Technology probably doesn’t make things better but it was failing me in elementary school when the best of the best was the massive brick of a computer Macs in the computer lab was all we had

Here. Read this …wordpress.com/…/the-software-quality-and-product…

Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

• 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
• 75% of projects are expected to fail
• 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
• Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
• The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

Yet they choose:

• Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
• Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
• Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
• To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
• To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

That’s on the dev end of things but yes. Part of the build pipeline was re-obfuscation of your code so it’d actually work. Forge the mod loader just loaded the mods and provided code for modders to use. Forge Gradle was what handled the obfuscation stuff in dev