Why Internet Piracy is Making a Comeback - Discuss Online

The video argues that after years of decline, internet piracy is resurging around the world. It describes how the rising costs of streaming-service subscriptions, fragmentation of content across many platforms, and restrictive licensing make legally accessing movies, series, or shows increasingly expensive and complicated. Many users respond to those frustrations by returning to piracy, which often promises easier access, lower costs, and broader content availability. However, the video also warns that piracy’s comeback comes with serious risks — including increased exposure to malware, scams, security vulnerabilities, and potentially compromised devices or personal data.

How Will Lemmy and Social Media Handle Advanced Bots in the Future? - Discuss Online

As technology advances and computers become increasingly capable, the line between human and bot activity on social media platforms like Lemmy is becoming blurred. What are your thoughts on this matter? How do you think social media platforms, particularly Lemmy, should handle advanced bots in the future?

How do our brains process reality? I heard our eyes were just low-res cameras and our brains were doing all the heavy lifting in 'rendering' reality. - Discuss Online

Rethinking Moderation: A Call for Trust Level Systems in the Fediverse - Discuss Online

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/5772572 [https://discuss.online/post/5772572] > The current state of moderation across various online communities, especially on platforms like Reddit, has been a topic of much debate and dissatisfaction. Users have voiced concerns over issues such as moderator rudeness, abuse, bias, and a failure to adhere to their own guidelines. Moreover, many communities suffer from a lack of active moderation, as moderators often disengage due to the overwhelming demands of what essentially amounts to an unpaid, full-time job. This has led to a reliance on automated moderation tools and restrictions on user actions, which can stifle community engagement and growth. > > In light of these challenges, it’s time to explore alternative models of community moderation that can distribute responsibilities more equitably among users, reduce moderator burnout, and improve overall community health. One promising approach is the implementation of a trust level system, similar to that used by Discourse. Such a system rewards users for positive contributions and active participation by gradually increasing their privileges and responsibilities within the community. This not only incentivizes constructive behavior but also allows for a more organic and scalable form of moderation. > > Key features of a trust level system include: > > - Sandboxing New Users: Initially limiting the actions new users can take to prevent accidental harm to themselves or the community. > - Gradual Privilege Escalation: Allowing users to earn more rights over time, such as the ability to post pictures, edit wikis, or moderate discussions, based on their contributions and behavior. > - Federated Reputation: Considering the integration of federated reputation systems, where users can carry over their trust levels from one community to another, encouraging cross-community engagement and trust. > > Implementing a trust level system could significantly alleviate the current strains on moderators and create a more welcoming and self-sustaining community environment. It encourages users to be more active and responsible members of their communities, knowing that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded. Moreover, it reduces the reliance on a small group of moderators, distributing moderation tasks across a wider base of engaged and trusted users. > > For communities within the Fediverse, adopting a trust level system could mark a significant step forward in how we think about and manage online interactions. It offers a path toward more democratic and self-regulating communities, where moderation is not a burden shouldered by the few but a shared responsibility of the many. > > As we continue to navigate the complexities of online community management, it’s clear that innovative approaches like trust level systems could hold the key to creating more inclusive, respectful, and engaging spaces for everyone. > > #### Related > > - Grant users privileges based on activity level [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3548] > - Understanding Discourse Trust Levels [https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels] > - Federated Reputation [https://meta.discourse.org/t/federated-reputation/203679]

Rethinking Moderation: A Call for Trust Level Systems in the Fediverse - Discuss Online

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/5772572 [https://discuss.online/post/5772572] > The current state of moderation across various online communities, especially on platforms like Reddit, has been a topic of much debate and dissatisfaction. Users have voiced concerns over issues such as moderator rudeness, abuse, bias, and a failure to adhere to their own guidelines. Moreover, many communities suffer from a lack of active moderation, as moderators often disengage due to the overwhelming demands of what essentially amounts to an unpaid, full-time job. This has led to a reliance on automated moderation tools and restrictions on user actions, which can stifle community engagement and growth. > > In light of these challenges, it’s time to explore alternative models of community moderation that can distribute responsibilities more equitably among users, reduce moderator burnout, and improve overall community health. One promising approach is the implementation of a trust level system, similar to that used by Discourse. Such a system rewards users for positive contributions and active participation by gradually increasing their privileges and responsibilities within the community. This not only incentivizes constructive behavior but also allows for a more organic and scalable form of moderation. > > Key features of a trust level system include: > > - Sandboxing New Users: Initially limiting the actions new users can take to prevent accidental harm to themselves or the community. > - Gradual Privilege Escalation: Allowing users to earn more rights over time, such as the ability to post pictures, edit wikis, or moderate discussions, based on their contributions and behavior. > - Federated Reputation: Considering the integration of federated reputation systems, where users can carry over their trust levels from one community to another, encouraging cross-community engagement and trust. > > Implementing a trust level system could significantly alleviate the current strains on moderators and create a more welcoming and self-sustaining community environment. It encourages users to be more active and responsible members of their communities, knowing that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded. Moreover, it reduces the reliance on a small group of moderators, distributing moderation tasks across a wider base of engaged and trusted users. > > For communities within the Fediverse, adopting a trust level system could mark a significant step forward in how we think about and manage online interactions. It offers a path toward more democratic and self-regulating communities, where moderation is not a burden shouldered by the few but a shared responsibility of the many. > > As we continue to navigate the complexities of online community management, it’s clear that innovative approaches like trust level systems could hold the key to creating more inclusive, respectful, and engaging spaces for everyone. > > #### Related > > - Grant users privileges based on activity level [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3548] > - Understanding Discourse Trust Levels [https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels] > - Federated Reputation [https://meta.discourse.org/t/federated-reputation/203679]

Rethinking Moderation: A Call for Trust Level Systems in the Fediverse - Discuss Online

The current state of moderation across various online communities, especially on platforms like Reddit, has been a topic of much debate and dissatisfaction. Users have voiced concerns over issues such as moderator rudeness, abuse, bias, and a failure to adhere to their own guidelines. Moreover, many communities suffer from a lack of active moderation, as moderators often disengage due to the overwhelming demands of what essentially amounts to an unpaid, full-time job. This has led to a reliance on automated moderation tools and restrictions on user actions, which can stifle community engagement and growth. In light of these challenges, it’s time to explore alternative models of community moderation that can distribute responsibilities more equitably among users, reduce moderator burnout, and improve overall community health. One promising approach is the implementation of a trust level system, similar to that used by Discourse. Such a system rewards users for positive contributions and active participation by gradually increasing their privileges and responsibilities within the community. This not only incentivizes constructive behavior but also allows for a more organic and scalable form of moderation. Key features of a trust level system include: - Sandboxing New Users: Initially limiting the actions new users can take to prevent accidental harm to themselves or the community. - Gradual Privilege Escalation: Allowing users to earn more rights over time, such as the ability to post pictures, edit wikis, or moderate discussions, based on their contributions and behavior. - Federated Reputation: Considering the integration of federated reputation systems, where users can carry over their trust levels from one community to another, encouraging cross-community engagement and trust. Implementing a trust level system could significantly alleviate the current strains on moderators and create a more welcoming and self-sustaining community environment. It encourages users to be more active and responsible members of their communities, knowing that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded. Moreover, it reduces the reliance on a small group of moderators, distributing moderation tasks across a wider base of engaged and trusted users. For communities within the Fediverse, adopting a trust level system could mark a significant step forward in how we think about and manage online interactions. It offers a path toward more democratic and self-regulating communities, where moderation is not a burden shouldered by the few but a shared responsibility of the many. As we continue to navigate the complexities of online community management, it’s clear that innovative approaches like trust level systems could hold the key to creating more inclusive, respectful, and engaging spaces for everyone. #### Related - Grant users privileges based on activity level [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3548] - Understanding Discourse Trust Levels [https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels] - Federated Reputation [https://meta.discourse.org/t/federated-reputation/203679]

The Great Monkey Tagging Army: How Fake Internet Points Can Save Us All! - Discuss Online

cross-posted from: [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] > Ever noticed how people online will jump through hoops, climb mountains, and even summon the powers of ancient memes just to earn some fake digital points? It’s a wild world out there in the realm of social media, where karma reigns supreme and gamification is the name of the game. > > But what if we could harness this insatiable thirst for validation and turn it into something truly magnificent? Imagine a social media platform where an army of monkeys tirelessly tags every post with precision and dedication, all in the pursuit of those elusive internet points. > > Reddit uses this strategy to increase their content quantity, while Stack Overflow employs it for moderation and quality control. The power of gamification and leaderboards has been proven time and time again to motivate users to contribute more and better. > > With a leaderboard showcasing the top users per day, week, month, and year, the competition would be fierce. Who wouldn’t want to be crowned the Tagging Champion of the Month or the Sultan of Sorting? The drive for recognition combined with the power of gamification could revolutionize content curation as we know it. > > And the benefits? Oh, they’re endless! Imagine a social media landscape where every piece of content is perfectly tagged, allowing users to navigate without fear of stumbling upon triggering or phobia-inducing material. This proactive approach can help users avoid inadvertently coming across content that triggers phobias, traumatic events, or other sensitive topics. > > It’s like a digital safe haven where you can frolic through memes and cat videos without a care in the world. So next time you see someone going to great lengths for those fake internet points, just remember - they might just be part of the Great Monkey Tagging Army, working tirelessly to make your online experience safer and more enjoyable. Embrace the madness, my friends, for in the chaos lies true innovation! > > #### Related > - Post Tags [https://github.com/sublinks/sublinks-api/issues/171] > - Advanced Search and Tag Filtering [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3788] > - Filter for Hiding Unwanted Content [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1847] > - Comprehensive Tagging System [https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/issues/1533] > - Post tags [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/317] > - Request for Comments: Flexible Tag System [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3951] > - Booru-Style Image View, Search and Tagging by Users [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3626] > - Grant users privileges based on activity level [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3548]

The Great Monkey Tagging Army: How Fake Internet Points Can Save Us All! - Discuss Online

cross-posted from: [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] > Ever noticed how people online will jump through hoops, climb mountains, and even summon the powers of ancient memes just to earn some fake digital points? It’s a wild world out there in the realm of social media, where karma reigns supreme and gamification is the name of the game. > > But what if we could harness this insatiable thirst for validation and turn it into something truly magnificent? Imagine a social media platform where an army of monkeys tirelessly tags every post with precision and dedication, all in the pursuit of those elusive internet points. > > Reddit uses this strategy to increase their content quantity, while Stack Overflow employs it for moderation and quality control. The power of gamification and leaderboards has been proven time and time again to motivate users to contribute more and better. > > With a leaderboard showcasing the top users per day, week, month, and year, the competition would be fierce. Who wouldn’t want to be crowned the Tagging Champion of the Month or the Sultan of Sorting? The drive for recognition combined with the power of gamification could revolutionize content curation as we know it. > > And the benefits? Oh, they’re endless! Imagine a social media landscape where every piece of content is perfectly tagged, allowing users to navigate without fear of stumbling upon triggering or phobia-inducing material. This proactive approach can help users avoid inadvertently coming across content that triggers phobias, traumatic events, or other sensitive topics. > > It’s like a digital safe haven where you can frolic through memes and cat videos without a care in the world. So next time you see someone going to great lengths for those fake internet points, just remember - they might just be part of the Great Monkey Tagging Army, working tirelessly to make your online experience safer and more enjoyable. Embrace the madness, my friends, for in the chaos lies true innovation! > > #### Related > - Post Tags [https://github.com/sublinks/sublinks-api/issues/171] > - Advanced Search and Tag Filtering [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3788] > - Filter for Hiding Unwanted Content [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1847] > - Comprehensive Tagging System [https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/issues/1533] > - Post tags [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/317] > - Request for Comments: Flexible Tag System [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3951] > - Booru-Style Image View, Search and Tagging by Users [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3626] > - Grant users privileges based on activity level [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3548]

Frustration with Lemmy Devs' Lack of User Feedback Consideration - Discuss Online

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/5768097 [https://discuss.online/post/5768097] Greetings c/lemmy_support community, I wanted to express my frustration with the Lemmy developers for consistently closing my reported issues as “not planned” without involving the community in the decision-making process. It appears that the devs prioritize their own interests, such as developing Android thumb keyboard apps, over listening to user feedback and addressing community priorities. Given this approach, I have decided that I will not be contributing to this project in any capacity. It is disheartening to see a lack of consideration for user input and a focus on personal projects rather than community needs. For reference, you can view the list of my reported issues on GitHub for Lemmy here: - Lemmy Backend Issues: Link [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3A8ullyMaguire+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc] - Lemmy UI Issues: Link [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3A8ullyMaguire+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc] Thank you for your attention, but I regret to say that I will not be engaging further with this project due to the lack of user-centric development practices.

Concerns about Lemmy Devs Closing Issues Without Community Input - Discuss Online

Hello c/sublinks_support community, I wanted to bring to your attention a concern I have regarding the Lemmy developers closing many of my issues as “not planned” without allowing the community to provide input. I am curious if there is a system in place for determining which issues are added to the roadmap and which are closed as not planned. If the sublinks developers follow transparent rules for issue prioritization and consider some of my suggestions for the roadmap, I am willing to become more involved in the project development. While it has been some time since college when I last programmed in Java, I am prepared to refresh my skills and get up to speed with Spring Boot. You can find the list of my reported issues on GitHub for Lemmy here: - Lemmy Backend Issues: Link [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3A8ullyMaguire+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc] - Lemmy UI Issues: Link [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3A8ullyMaguire+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc] I look forward to understanding more about the process and potentially contributing further to the project. Thank you for your attention.