TheZoltan
- 0 Followers
- 1 Following
- 18 Posts
I think they misunderstood a Stats Canada paper to get a wildly unrealistic cost estimate. I linked it and some numbers in a reply further up.
I'm pretty sure they got their numbers wrong. I have linked to a Stats Canada article in a different reply with what I think are correct numbers that are massively higher than their claim.
I saw your cost claim and found it really hard to believe. I mean I spend more than $200 a month raising two cats lol. I found this from Stats Canada from 2017 https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2023007-eng.htm as far as I can see your numbers a way off. Looking at Table 2 for Predicted annual expenditures for one child in a one child family. It costs $14960 a year from 0-5 or $1246 a month which seems much more realistic. I wonder if you were assuming that total was from 0-5 rather than the total per year from 0-5. If you take the 0-17 total of $290,580 the monthly is $1424.
Estimating Expenditures on Children by Families in Canada, 2014 to 2017
Caring for children is among the key functions of families and the larger society. In Canada, the question of affordability issues for families with children has become an increasingly important area of public policy. Also, information on the monetary cost of meeting children’s needs for food, shelter, clothing, health care, and education is important for family planning and budgeting decisions made by people raising children.
This comic is a good example of the Paradox of Tolerance. You can't tolerate intolerance.... it does not end well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
You don't need to keep the Royal Family to stay in the Commonwealth. Take a look at the current members of the common wealth.
I mean the title literally says "forcing browsers" and unsurprisingly Mozilla post uses Firefox as an example.
Billions of zombies.... that then feast on the living. This could be the worst outcome.
I think the easiest route would be to just use the built in windows disk image tool? MS have increasingly hidden it over the years but it still works. Basically you take an image of your current system, then remove the old HDD, install the new one, restore the image. It does require having enough space on a spare disk to create the image.
This guide looks to cover creating an image:
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/how-to-create-a-system-image-in-windows-10/84fa6683-e3ac-4e93-9139-368af9267869
and this one covers restoring it: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/how-to-restore-a-windows-10-system-image-to-an/e20992ca-5641-4f7c-bb09-3895d0732162
This guide looks to cover creating an image:
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/how-to-create-a-system-image-in-windows-10/84fa6683-e3ac-4e93-9139-368af9267869
and this one covers restoring it: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/how-to-restore-a-windows-10-system-image-to-an/e20992ca-5641-4f7c-bb09-3895d0732162
I can see this isn't your first rodeo!
Yeah they messed up their logic. They seem to imply people are sexualizing the MILFs kid which is a bit weird.