And they’ve tied the dependency tree together such that you can’t disable them without entirely breaking updates.

This is exactly the kind of insanity we need around here. I think some of these choices are bonkers and that’s great.

There’s a third option. Find them and horde them as “weapons” but then sometimes get hacked and leak them all.

Yeah but imagine reading about a new release of something and it appearing in your updates the same day. Shiny new software every day is addicting.

I had the same thought. At panel 3 it’s just oh that’s nix with commas.

The issue with these stories is AI brain people don’t read them like normal people. This is a funny story for her not a total derision of everything she’s working on. The inherent lack of safety or control is a a feature, computer man do funny thing is a selling point.

Like covering the revolutionary war several times? How could we forgo that?!

Holy shit get off your high horse. You said exactly one sane thing: we should not let children be hungry at school. That’s it. You have no idea what situations these people are in. They might only be scrounging 1 meal a day, maybe less. Frankly it doesn’t matter in the slightest.

Yeah seems about right for this project. I really wanted this to be a serious browser, but nothing about this dude is serious.

Also I know he backed this statement up with much better testing but these AI brainrot things people say kill me: “I ran multiple passes of adversarial review, asking different models to analyze the code for mistakes and bad patterns.”

But like what am I supposed to do when senior ai reporter Benj writes his next piece? Ars works because the writers are generally experienced in the topics and do analysis and provide insight. Do we just accept that chatgpt is the new head ai writer with a meat puppet? They need to address the trust issue before this is resolved.