Why PHP is Still Alive? Or Why Node Can't Kill It.
You may hate me for this, but this is what’s really going on. I love JS/TS and Node but the world is built in economies of scale not in love for programming languages… and PHP is the best when it comes to cheap scaling. Really hope someone at Node decides to make it fast-cgi compatible in a nice way.
Why PHP is Still Alive? Or Why Node Can't Kill It.
You may hate me for this, but this is what’s really going on. I love JS/TS and Node but the world is built in economies of scale not in love for programming languages… and PHP is the best when it comes to cheap scaling. Really hope someone at Node decides to make it fast-cgi compatible in a nice way.
🛡️ uSentry - Identity & Access Management
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28692919 [https://lemmy.world/post/28692919] > uSentry is a lightweight, self-hosted Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Single Sign-On (SSO) solution designed for homelab and small-scale environments. > > ⚡ A single PHP file. < 400 lines of code. No database. No background processes. No cloud. Just works. ⚡ > > Most IAM and SSO solutions require databases, certificates and background services baked into a dozen containers. This is all fine but also also overkill for homelabs and impossible for low-power ARM devices. uSentry is different, it isn’t pretty but it sucks less for a lot of use cases. > > Enjoy!
🛡️ uSentry - Identity & Access Management
uSentry is a lightweight, self-hosted Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Single Sign-On (SSO) solution designed for homelab and small-scale environments. ⚡ A single PHP file. < 400 lines of code. No database. No background processes. No cloud. Just works. ⚡ Most IAM and SSO solutions require databases, certificates and background services baked into a dozen containers. This is all fine but also also overkill for homelabs and impossible for low-power ARM devices. uSentry is different, it isn’t pretty but it sucks less for a lot of use cases. Enjoy!
Paranoia Level: Virtualization vs Isolated Machines for Self-Hosting?
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23071801 [https://lemmy.world/post/23071801] > Considering a lot of people here are self-hosting both private stuff, like a NAS and also some other is public like websites and whatnot, how do you approach segmentation in the context of virtual machines versus dedicated machines? > > This is generally how I see the community action on this: > > ## Scenario 1: Fully Isolated Machine for Public Stuff > Two servers one for the internal stuff (NAS) and another for the public stuff totally isolated from your LAN (websites, email etc). Preferably with a public IP that is not the same as your LAN and the traffic to that machines doesn’t go through your main router. Eg. a switch between the ISP ONT and your router that also has a cable connected for the isolated machine. This way the machine is completely isolated from your network and not dependent on it. > > ## Scenario 2: Single server with VM exposed > A single server hosting two VMs, one to host a NAS along with a few internal services running in containers, and another to host publicly exposed websites. Each website could have its own container inside the VM for added isolation, with a reverse proxy container managing traffic. > > For networking, I typically see two main options: > > - Option A: Completely isolate the “public-facing” VM from the internal network by using a dedicated NIC in passthrough mode for the VM; > - Option B: Use a switch to deliver two VLANs to the host—one for the internal network and one for public internet access. In this scenario, the host would have two VLAN-tagged interfaces (e.g., eth0.X) and bridge one of them with the “public” VM’s network interface. Here’s a diagram for reference: https://ibb.co/PTkQVBF [https://ibb.co/PTkQVBF] > > In the second option, a firewall would run inside the “public” VM to drop all inbound except for http traffic. The host would simply act as a bridge and would not participate in the network in any way. > > ## Scenario 3: Exposed VM on a Windows/Linux Desktop Host > Windows/Linux desktop machine that runs KVM/VirtualBox/VMware to host a VM that is directly exposed to the internet with its own public IP assigned by the ISP. In this setup, a dedicated NIC would be passed through to the VM for isolation. > > The host OS would be used as a personal desktop and contain sensitive information. > > ## Scenario 4: Dual-Boot Between Desktop and Server > A dual-boot setup where the user switches between a OS for daily usage and another for hosting stuff when needed (with a public IP assigned by the ISP). The machine would have a single Ethernet interface and the user would manually switch network cables between: a) the router (NAT/internal network) when running the “personal” OS and b) a direct connection to the switch (and ISP) when running the “public/hosting” OS. > > For increased security, each OS would be installed on a separate NVMe drive, and the “personal” one would use TPM with full disk encryption to protect sensitive data. If the “public/hosting” system were compromised. > > The theory here is that, if properly done, the TPM doesn’t release the keys to decrypt the “personal” disk OS when the user is booted into the “public/hosting” OS. > > People also seem to combine both scenarios with Cloudflare tunnels or reverse proxies on cheap VPS. > > ------- > > What’s your approach / paranoia level :D > > Do you think using separate physical machines is really the only sensible way to go? How likely do you think VM escape attacks and VLAN hopping or other networking-based attacks are? > > Let’s discuss how secure these setups are, what pitfalls one should watch out for on each one, and what considerations need to be addressed.
Paranoia Level: Virtualization or Isolated Machines for Self-Hosting?
Considering a lot of people here are self-hosting both private stuff, like a NAS and also some other is public like websites and whatnot, how do you approach segmentation in the context of virtual machines versus dedicated machines? This is generally how I see the community action on this: Scenario 1: Fully Isolated Machine for Public Stuff Two servers one for the internal stuff (NAS) and another for the public stuff totally isolated from your LAN (websites, email etc). Preferably with a public IP that is not the same as your LAN and the traffic to that machines doesn’t go through your main router. Eg. a switch between the ISP ONT and your router that also has a cable connected for the isolated machine. This way the machine is completely isolated from your network and not dependent on it. Scenario 2: Single server with VM exposed A single server hosting two VMs, one to host a NAS along with a few internal services running in containers, and another to host publicly exposed websites. Each website could have its own container inside the VM for added isolation, with a reverse proxy container managing traffic. For networking, I typically see two main options: - Option A: Completely isolate the “public-facing” VM from the internal network by using a dedicated NIC in passthrough mode for the VM; - Option B: Use a switch to deliver two VLANs to the host—one for the internal network and one for public internet access. In this scenario, the host would have two VLAN-tagged interfaces (e.g., eth0.X) and bridge one of them with the “public” VM’s network interface. Here’s a diagram for reference: https://ibb.co/PTkQVBF [https://ibb.co/PTkQVBF] In the second option, a firewall would run inside the “public” VM to drop all inbound except for http traffic. The host would simply act as a bridge and would not participate in the network in any way. People also seem to combine both scenarios with Cloudflare tunnels or reverse proxies on cheap VPS. ------- What’s your approach / paranoia level :D Do you think using separate physical machines is really the only sensible way to go? How likely do you think VM escape attacks and VLAN hopping or other networking-based attacks are? Let’s discuss how secure these setups are, what pitfalls one should watch out for on each one, and what considerations need to be addressed.
Sonic Adventure Cover - High Resolution Image
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21563379 [https://lemmy.world/post/21563379] > Hello, > > I’m looking for a high resolution image of the PAL cover from the Dreamcast (I believe). > > There was this website covergalaxy that used it have in 2382x2382 but all the content seems to be gone. Here’s the cache https://ibb.co/nRMhjgw [https://ibb.co/nRMhjgw] . Internet archive doesn’t have it. > > Much appreciated! >
Sonic Adventure Cover - High Resolution Image
Hello, I’m looking for a high resolution image of the PAL cover from the Dreamcast (I believe). There was this website covergalaxy that used it have in 2382x2382 but all the content seems to be gone. Here’s the cache https://ibb.co/nRMhjgw [https://ibb.co/nRMhjgw] . Internet archive doesn’t have it. Much appreciated!
So you want privacy?
The most severe restrictions to the general public are imposed within a 20-mile (32 km) radius of the Green Bank Observatory.[5] The Observatory polices the area actively for devices emitting excessive electromagnetic radiation such as microwave ovens, Wi-Fi access points and faulty electrical equipment and request citizens discontinue their usage. It does not have enforcement power[6] (although the FCC can impose a fine of $50 on violators[7]), but will work with residents to find solutions.
ESP32 - Clock gotchas and how to fix them
