0 Followers
0 Following
0 Posts

Citrus Propagation & Root Flare Exposure

https://lemmy.world/post/44423702

Pascal (GTX 1070) on Arch after NVIDIA 590... what’s the sane long-term path?

https://lemmy.world/post/40802227

Pascal (GTX 1070) on Arch after NVIDIA 590... what’s the sane long-term path? - Lemmy.World

So Arch just moved to NVIDIA 590 and dropped Pascal support. I’m running an older Predator laptop with a GTX 1070 (Pascal) + Intel iGPU. After the update, NVIDIA is basically gone, but Intel fallback still gives me a working desktop. This machine was always a fallback gaming laptop, not my primary system, but I’d still like to make reasonable use of it. My current situation: Arch Linux with KDE Plasma, Intel graphics works fine, NVIDIA 1070 is unusable unless I go legacy, Wayland currently working only because I’m on Intel. From what I understand: NVIDIA legacy (580xx) = X11 only, Wayland + Pascal is basically dead. Arch will keep moving kernels, so legacy drivers mean ongoing maintenance… (picture related). What I’m trying to decide: Stick with Arch, install legacy NVIDIA, switch to X11, accept maintenance? Ditch NVIDIA entirely, run Intel + Wayland, and treat the 1070 as dead weight? Switch to a slower-moving distro (Debian?) just to keep X11 + NVIDIA working longer? Or is there a better hybrid setup people are actually happy with? I’m not looking to resurrect Pascal forever, just trying to choose the least stupid path for a secondary machine without fighting my system every update. Curious what others with GTX 10xx laptops are actually doing in practice.

Pascal (GTX 1070) on Arch after NVIDIA 590... what’s the sane long-term path?

https://lemmy.world/post/40801697

Pascal (GTX 1070) on Arch after NVIDIA 590... what’s the sane long-term path? - Lemmy.World

So Arch just moved to NVIDIA 590 and dropped Pascal support. I’m running an older Predator laptop with a GTX 1070 (Pascal) + Intel iGPU. After the update, NVIDIA is basically gone, but Intel fallback still gives me a working desktop. This machine was always a fallback gaming laptop, not my primary system, but I’d still like to make reasonable use of it. My current situation: Arch Linux with KDE Plasma, Intel graphics works fine, NVIDIA 1070 is unusable unless I go legacy, Wayland currently working only because I’m on Intel. From what I understand: NVIDIA legacy (580xx) = X11 only, Wayland + Pascal is basically dead. Arch will keep moving kernels, so legacy drivers mean ongoing maintenance… (picture related). What I’m trying to decide: Stick with Arch, install legacy NVIDIA, switch to X11, accept maintenance? Ditch NVIDIA entirely, run Intel + Wayland, and treat the 1070 as dead weight? Switch to a slower-moving distro (Debian?) just to keep X11 + NVIDIA working longer? Or is there a better hybrid setup people are actually happy with? I’m not looking to resurrect Pascal forever, just trying to choose the least stupid path for a secondary machine without fighting my system every update. Curious what others with GTX 10xx laptops are actually doing in practice.

:y soul from /dev/null | :put flesh | :%s/existence/thresher/g

https://lemmy.world/post/38543189

:y soul from /dev/null | :put flesh | :%s/existence/thresher/g - Lemmy.World

The hubris it must take to yank a soul out of nonexistence into this… meat, to force a life into this… thresher.

ich🍜👖iel - Lemmy.World

Jeanstantnudeln oder. Keine Ahnung.

What are they? - Lemmy.World

Hi! Any idea on what those are? I found them in my raised bed while preparing it for the spring season. They look like little onions but have the texture of potatoes. I live in Georgia, USA.

ich🐟iel - Lemmy.world

Wenn ich die ganzen Störche loswerden will.